Endoscopy versus early surgery for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Boregowda, Umesha [1 ]
Echavarria, Juan [1 ]
Umapathy, Chandraprakash [1 ]
Rosenkranz, Laura [1 ]
Sayana, Hari [1 ]
Patel, Sandeep [1 ]
Saligram, Shreyas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
Chronic pancreatitis; Pancreatic strictures; Pancreatic sphincterotomy; Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatojejunostomy; PAIN; GUIDELINES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-022-09425-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aim Endoscopic stone removal and stenting of pancreatic strictures are the initial treatment for treating chronic pancreatitis-related pain. Surgery is considered when endoscopic interventions fail to improve symptoms. In this meta-analysis, we have compared early surgery versus endoscopic interventions. Methods The study was performed as per the PRISMA statement. The literature search was conducted on online databases to identify studies that compared endoscopy and surgery for the management of chronic pancreatitis symptoms. Primary outcomes of interest were pain relief, complications, and exocrine/endocrine insufficiency. Secondary outcomes were mean length of stay and mean number of procedures. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated using random-effects model with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Of a total of 9880 articles that were screened, three randomized controlled trials and two retrospective studies with 602 patients (71.4% males) were found to be eligible. Endoscopic interventions were performed in 317 patients and 285 patients underwent early surgery. Early surgery provided significantly better pain relief compared to endoscopy (OR 0.46; 95%CI 0.27-0.80; p = 0.01; I-2 = 17.65%) and required less number of procedures (Mean difference 1.66; 95%CI 0.9-2.43; p = 0.00; I-2 = 96.46%). There was no significant difference in procedure-related complication (OR 0.91; 95%CI 0.51-1.61; p = 0.74; I-2 = 38.8%), endocrine (OR 1.18; 95%CI 0.63-2.20; p = 0.61; I-2 = 28.24%), or exocrine insufficiency (OR 1.78; 95%CI 0.66-4.79; p = 0.25; I-2 = 30.97%) or the length of stay (Mean difference 1.21; 95%CI -7.12 to 4.70; p = 0.69). Conclusion Compared to endoscopy, early surgery appears to be better in controlling chronic pancreatitis-related pain, with no significant difference in procedure-related complications. However, larger randomized controlled trials are needed to ascertain their efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:8753 / 8763
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Dietary Intake of Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ul-Ain, Q.
    Bashir, Y.
    Bourne, D. M.
    Kelleher, L.
    Egan, S. M.
    McMahon, J.
    Keaskin, L.
    Griffin, O. M.
    Duggan, S. N.
    Conlon, K. C.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (SUPPL 6) : S243 - S243
  • [42] Prevalence of primary painless chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bhullar, Furqan A.
    Faghih, Mahya
    Akshintala, Venkata S.
    Ahmed, Ahmed I.
    Lobner, Katie
    Afghani, Elham
    Phillips, Anna E.
    Hart, Phil A.
    Ramsey, Mitchell L.
    Bick, Benjamin L.
    Kuhlmann, Louise
    Drewes, Asbjorn M.
    Yadav, Dhiraj
    Olesen, Soren S.
    Singh, Vikesh K.
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01) : 20 - 29
  • [43] Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Beas, Renato
    Karkash, Ahmad
    Chambergo-Michilot, Diego
    Aljaras, Rawan
    Montalvan-Sanchez, Eleazar E.
    Diaz-Pardave, Celeste
    Riva-Moscoso, Adrian
    Ramirez-Rojas, Mirian
    Calderon, Gerardo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S45 - S46
  • [44] Antioxidant therapy for patients with chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Dongkai
    Wang, Weilin
    Cheng, Xiaofei
    Wei, Jianfeng
    Zheng, Shusen
    CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2015, 34 (04) : 627 - 634
  • [45] Burden of bone disease in chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chhoda, Ankit
    Hernandez-Woodbine, Maria Jose
    Addo, Nana Afua Akkya
    Nasir, Syed Alishan
    Grimshaw, Alyssa
    Gunderson, Craig
    Ahmed, Awais
    Freedman, Steven D.
    Sheth, Sunil G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 29 (08) : 1374 - 1394
  • [46] Incidence of recurrent and chronic pancreatitis after acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gagyi, Endre-Botond
    Teutsch, Brigitta
    Veres, Daniel Sandor
    Palinkas, Daniel
    Vorhendi, Nora
    Ocskay, Klementina
    Marta, Katalin
    Hegyi, Peter Jeno
    Hegyi, Peter
    Eross, Balint
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 17
  • [47] Flexible versus rigid endoscopy in the management of esophageal foreign body impaction: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ferrari, Davide
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Riva, Carlo Galdino
    Rausa, Emanuele
    Siboni, Stefano
    Toti, Francesco
    Bonavina, Luigi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2018, 13
  • [48] Flexible versus rigid endoscopy in the management of esophageal foreign body impaction: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Davide Ferrari
    Alberto Aiolfi
    Gianluca Bonitta
    Carlo Galdino Riva
    Emanuele Rausa
    Stefano Siboni
    Francesco Toti
    Luigi Bonavina
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 13
  • [50] Letter to the Editor: Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Uday Singh Dadhwal
    World Journal of Surgery, 2022, 46 : 2539 - 2540