Endoscopy versus early surgery for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Boregowda, Umesha [1 ]
Echavarria, Juan [1 ]
Umapathy, Chandraprakash [1 ]
Rosenkranz, Laura [1 ]
Sayana, Hari [1 ]
Patel, Sandeep [1 ]
Saligram, Shreyas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
Chronic pancreatitis; Pancreatic strictures; Pancreatic sphincterotomy; Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatojejunostomy; PAIN; GUIDELINES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-022-09425-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aim Endoscopic stone removal and stenting of pancreatic strictures are the initial treatment for treating chronic pancreatitis-related pain. Surgery is considered when endoscopic interventions fail to improve symptoms. In this meta-analysis, we have compared early surgery versus endoscopic interventions. Methods The study was performed as per the PRISMA statement. The literature search was conducted on online databases to identify studies that compared endoscopy and surgery for the management of chronic pancreatitis symptoms. Primary outcomes of interest were pain relief, complications, and exocrine/endocrine insufficiency. Secondary outcomes were mean length of stay and mean number of procedures. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated using random-effects model with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Of a total of 9880 articles that were screened, three randomized controlled trials and two retrospective studies with 602 patients (71.4% males) were found to be eligible. Endoscopic interventions were performed in 317 patients and 285 patients underwent early surgery. Early surgery provided significantly better pain relief compared to endoscopy (OR 0.46; 95%CI 0.27-0.80; p = 0.01; I-2 = 17.65%) and required less number of procedures (Mean difference 1.66; 95%CI 0.9-2.43; p = 0.00; I-2 = 96.46%). There was no significant difference in procedure-related complication (OR 0.91; 95%CI 0.51-1.61; p = 0.74; I-2 = 38.8%), endocrine (OR 1.18; 95%CI 0.63-2.20; p = 0.61; I-2 = 28.24%), or exocrine insufficiency (OR 1.78; 95%CI 0.66-4.79; p = 0.25; I-2 = 30.97%) or the length of stay (Mean difference 1.21; 95%CI -7.12 to 4.70; p = 0.69). Conclusion Compared to endoscopy, early surgery appears to be better in controlling chronic pancreatitis-related pain, with no significant difference in procedure-related complications. However, larger randomized controlled trials are needed to ascertain their efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:8753 / 8763
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endoscopy versus early surgery for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Umesha Boregowda
    Juan Echavarria
    Chandraprakash Umapathy
    Laura Rosenkranz
    Hari Sayana
    Sandeep Patel
    Shreyas Saligram
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 8753 - 8763
  • [2] Surgery versus Endoscopy for the Management of Painful Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Cassar, Noel
    Cromwell, Paul
    Duggan, Sinead
    van Veldhuisen, Charlotte
    Boermeester, Marja
    Besselink, Marc
    Conlon, Kevin
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 41 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [3] ENDOSCOPIC INTERVENTION VERSUS EARLY SURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PANCREATITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Boregowda, Umesha
    Saligram, Shreyas
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : AB181 - AB181
  • [4] Efficacy of endoscopic interventions versus surgery for pain management in patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Caleb Na
    Tony He
    Kareem Khalaf
    Yuhong Yuan
    Alessandro Fugazza
    Shiva Jayaraman
    Katarzyna M. Pawlak
    Sunil Gupta
    Roxana Chis
    Christopher W. Teshima
    Jeffrey D. Mosko
    Gary R. May
    Natalia Causada Calo
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 (12) : 7055 - 7063
  • [5] Effectiveness of digestive endoscopy and surgery in the treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Tang, Peng
    Zha, Qinqing
    Zhou, Lihua
    Yang, Qiulian
    He, Mingfeng
    Zhu, Shaomin
    Liu, Yan
    GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (09) : 2754 - 2765
  • [6] Laparoscopic surgery versus Endoscopy in the management Common Bile Duct Stones: systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Elhag, Hafs
    Eltayeb, Omar
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [7] Early versus delayed interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nakai, Yousuke
    Shiomi, Hideyuki
    Hamada, Tsuyoshi
    Ota, Shogo
    Takenaka, Mamoru
    Iwashita, Takuji
    Sato, Tatsuya
    Saito, Tomotaka
    Masuda, Atsuhiro
    Matsubara, Saburo
    Iwata, Keisuke
    Mukai, Tsuyoshi
    Isayama, Hiroyuki
    Yasuda, Ichiro
    DEN OPEN, 2023, 3 (01):
  • [8] Surgery remains the best option for the management of pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jawad, Zaynab A. R.
    Kyriakides, Charis
    Pai, Madhava
    Wadsworth, Chris
    Westaby, David
    Vlavianos, Panagiotis
    Jiao, Long R.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 40 (03) : 179 - 185
  • [9] The Diagnosis of Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Johnstone, M.
    Jackson, R.
    Hanna, T.
    Nicholson, J.
    Neoptolemos, J. P.
    Greenhalf, W.
    Sutton, R.
    PANCREAS, 2014, 43 (08) : 1372 - 1372
  • [10] 38 Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Endoscopy in the Management Common Bile Duct Stones: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Elhag, H. E.
    Eltayab, O.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (SUPPL 6)