Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation

被引:238
作者
Sarkar, K [1 ]
Shi, WT
Chatterjee, D
Forsberg, F
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Mech Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Philips Res Labs, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510 USA
[4] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Madras 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1923367
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Zero-thickness interface models are developed to describe the encapsulation of microbubble contrast agents. Two different theological models of the interface, Newtonian (viscous) and viscoelastic, with theological parameters such as surface tension, surface dilatational viscosity, and surface dilatational elasticity are presented to characterize the encapsulation. The models are applied to characterize a widely used microbubble based ultrasound contrast agent. Attenuation of ultrasound passing through a solution of contrast agent is measured. The model parameters for the contrast agent are determined by matching the linearized model dynamics with measured attenuation data. The models are investigated for its ability to match with other experiments. Specifically, model predictions are compared with scattered fundamental and subharmonic responses. Experiments and model prediction results are discussed along with those obtained using an existing model [Church, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1510 (1995) and Hoff et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 2272 (2000)] of contrast agents. (c) 2005 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 550
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   GAUGING THE LIKELIHOOD OF CAVITATION FROM SHORT-PULSE, LOW-DUTY CYCLE DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND [J].
APFEL, RE ;
HOLLAND, CK .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (02) :179-185
[2]  
Brennen C. E., 1995, CAVITATION BUBBLE DY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107338760
[3]   Quantitative measurements of second harmonic Doppler using ultrasound contrast agents [J].
Chang, PH ;
Shung, KK ;
Levene, HB .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 22 (09) :1205-1214
[4]   A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents [J].
Chatterjee, D ;
Sarkar, K .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 29 (12) :1749-1757
[5]   A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents [J].
Chen, WS ;
Matula, TJ ;
Brayman, AA ;
Crum, LA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 113 (01) :643-651
[6]  
CHRISTIANSEN C, 1994, BIOTECHNOL APPL BIOC, V19, P307
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF AN ELASTIC SOLID-SURFACE LAYER ON THE RADIAL PULSATIONS OF GAS-BUBBLES [J].
CHURCH, CC .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1995, 97 (03) :1510-1521
[8]   LINEAR PRESSURE WAVES IN BUBBLY LIQUIDS - COMPARISON BETWEEN THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS [J].
COMMANDER, KW ;
PROSPERETTI, A .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1989, 85 (02) :732-746
[9]   ULTRASOUND SCATTERING PROPERTIES OF ALBUNEX MICROSPHERES [J].
DEJONG, N ;
HOFF, L .
ULTRASONICS, 1993, 31 (03) :175-181
[10]   ABSORPTION AND SCATTER OF ENCAPSULATED GAS FILLED MICROSPHERES - THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND SOME MEASUREMENTS [J].
DEJONG, N ;
HOFF, L ;
SKOTLAND, T ;
BOM, N .
ULTRASONICS, 1992, 30 (02) :95-103