Optimal Portfolio Diversification via Independent Component Analysis

被引:18
作者
Lassance, Nathan [1 ]
DeMiguel, Victor [2 ]
Vrins, Frederic [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Louvain Inst Data Anal & Modeling, Louvain Finance, B-7000 Mons, Belgium
[2] London Business Sch, Management Sci & Operat Dept, London NW1 4SA, England
关键词
portfolio selection; risk parity; factor analysis; principal component analysis; higher moments; VALUE-AT-RISK; NAIVE DIVERSIFICATION; SKEWNESS PORTFOLIO; ASSET ALLOCATION; ROBUST; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; OPTIMIZATION; CONSTRAINTS; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1287/opre.2021.2140
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A natural approach to enhance portfolio diversification is to rely on factor-risk parity, which yields the portfolio whose risk is equally spread among a set of uncorrelated factors. The standard choice is to take the variance as risk measure, and the principal components (PCs) of asset returns as factors. Although PCs are unique and useful for dimension reduction, they are an arbitrary choice: any rotation of the PCs results in uncorrelated factors. This is problematic becausewe demonstrate that any portfolio is a factor-variance-parity portfolio for some rotation of the PCs. More importantly, choosing the PCs does not account for the higher moments of asset returns. To overcome these issues, we propose using the independent components (ICs) as factors, which are the rotation of the PCs that are maximally independent, and care about higher moments of asset returns. We demonstrate that using the IC-variance-parity portfolio helps to reduce the return kurtosis. We also show how to exploit the near independence of the ICs to parsimoniously estimate the factor-risk-parity portfolio based on value at risk. Finally, we empirically demonstrate that portfolios based on ICs outperformthose based on PCs, and several state-of-the-art benchmarks.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 72
页数:19
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Ablin P., 2019, PROC 22 INT C ARTIF, P1564
[2]   A comparison of VaR and CVaR constraints on portfolio selection with the mean-variance model [J].
Alexander, GJ ;
Baptista, AM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (09) :1261-1273
[3]   Downside risk [J].
Ang, Andrew ;
Chen, Joseph ;
Xing, Yuhang .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2006, 19 (04) :1191-1239
[4]   Testing equality of modified Sharpe ratios [J].
Ardia, David ;
Boudt, Kris .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 13 :97-104
[5]   Least-squares approach to risk parity in portfolio selection [J].
Bai, Xi ;
Scheinberg, Katya ;
Tutuncu, Reha .
QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2016, 16 (03) :357-376
[6]   Extending the Risk Parity Approach to Higher Moments: Is There Any Value Added? [J].
Baitinger, Eduard ;
Dragosch, Andre ;
Topalova, Anastasia .
JOURNAL OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (02) :24-36
[7]   Machine Learning and Portfolio Optimization [J].
Ban, Gah-Yi ;
El Karoui, Noureddine ;
Lim, Andrew E. B. .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 64 (03) :1136-1154
[8]   A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics [J].
Belouchrani, A ;
AbedMeraim, K ;
Cardoso, JF ;
Moulines, E .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1997, 45 (02) :434-444
[9]   Algorithm for cardinality-constrained quadratic optimization [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Shioda, Romy .
COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2009, 43 (01) :1-22
[10]   A Coskewness Shrinkage Approach for Estimating the Skewness of Linear Combinations of Random Variables [J].
Boudt, Kris ;
Cornilly, Dries ;
Verdonck, Tim .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2020, 18 (01) :1-23