Dissecting molecular mechanisms underlying salt tolerance in rice: a comparative transcriptional profiling of the contrasting genotypes

被引:43
|
作者
Mansuri, Raheleh Mirdar [1 ,2 ]
Shobbar, Zahra-Sadat [1 ]
Jelodar, Nadali Babaeian [2 ]
Ghaffari, Mohammad Reza [1 ]
Nematzadeh, Ghorban-Ali [2 ]
Asari, Saeedeh [1 ]
机构
[1] AREEO, ABRII, Dept Syst Biol, POB 31535-1897, Karaj, Iran
[2] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Fac Crop Sci, Dept Plant Breeding & Biotechnol, Sari 578, Mazandaran, Iran
关键词
RNA-seq; Salt stress; Oryza sativa; Alternative splicing; ENHANCED TOLERANCE; SALINITY STRESS; GENE-EXPRESSION; IRON-DEFICIENCY; GROWTH; TRANSPORTERS; PROTEIN; LIPASE; TOOL; NA+;
D O I
10.1186/s12284-019-0273-2
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
BackgroundSalinity expansion in arable land is a threat to crop plants. Rice is the staple food crop across several countries worldwide; however, its salt sensitive nature severely affects its growth under excessive salinity. FL478 is a salt tolerant indica recombinant inbred line, which can be a good source of salt tolerance at the seedling stage in rice. To learn about the genetic basis of its tolerance to salinity, we compared transcriptome profiles of FL478 and its sensitive parent (IR29) using RNA-seq technique.ResultsA total of 1714 and 2670 genes were found differentially expressed (DEGs) under salt stress compared to normal conditions in FL478 and IR29, respectively. Gene ontology analysis revealed the enrichment of transcripts involved in salinity response, regulation of gene expression, and transport in both genotypes. Comparative transcriptome analysis revealed that 1063 DEGs were co-expressed, while 338/252 and 572/908 DEGs were exclusively up/down-regulated in FL478 and IR29, respectively. Further, some biological processes (e.g. iron ion transport, response to abiotic stimulus, and oxidative stress) and molecular function terms (e.g. zinc ion binding and cation transmembrane transporter activity) were specifically enriched in FL478 up-regulated transcripts. Based on the metabolic pathways analysis, genes encoding transport and major intrinsic proteins transporter superfamily comprising aquaporin subfamilies and genes involved in MAPK signaling and signaling receptor kinases were specifically enriched in FL478. A total of 1135 and 1894 alternative splicing events were identified in transcripts of FL478 and IR29, respectively. Transcripts encoding two potassium transporters and two major facilitator family transporters were specifically up-regulated in FL478 under salt stress but not in the salt sensitive genotype. Remarkably, 11 DEGs were conversely regulated in the studied genotypes; for example, OsZIFL, OsNAAT, OsGDSL, and OsELIP genes were up-regulated in FL478, while they were down-regulated in IR29.ConclusionsThe achieved results suggest that FL478 employs more efficient mechanisms (especially in signal transduction of salt stress, influx and transport of k(+), ionic and osmotic homeostasis, as well as ROS inhibition) to respond to the salt stress compared to its susceptible parent.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of drought-responsive transcriptome in Indica rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance
    Lenka, Sangram K.
    Katiyar, Amit
    Chinnusamy, Viswanathan
    Bansal, Kailash C.
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 9 (03) : 315 - 327
  • [42] Comparative Analysis of the Expression of Candidate Genes Governing Salt Tolerance and Yield Attributes in Two Contrasting Rice Genotypes, Encountering Salt Stress During Grain Development
    Saikat Paul
    Aryadeep Roychoudhury
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2019, 38 : 539 - 556
  • [43] Comparative metabolomic profiling in the roots and leaves in contrasting genotypes reveals complex mechanisms involved in post-anthesis drought tolerance in wheat
    Kang, Zhiyu
    Babar, Md Ali
    Khan, Naeem
    Guo, Jia
    Khan, Jahangir
    Islam, Shafiqul
    Shrestha, Sumit
    Shahi, Dipendra
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [44] Comparative Analysis of the Expression of Candidate Genes Governing Salt Tolerance and Yield Attributes in Two Contrasting Rice Genotypes, Encountering Salt Stress During Grain Development
    Paul, Saikat
    Roychoudhury, Aryadeep
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2019, 38 (02) : 539 - 556
  • [45] Drought responsive transcriptome profiling in roots of contrasting rice genotypes
    Raveendran M.
    Rahman H.
    Manoharan M.
    Ramanathan V.
    Nallathambi J.
    Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2018, 23 (3): : 393 - 407
  • [46] Comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of two salt-tolerant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genotypes: investigation of the mechanisms underlying tolerance to salt
    Hang, Jiahui
    Song, Ting
    Zhang, Ling
    Hou, Wenjun
    Liu, Xiaoxia
    Ma, Dongmei
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15
  • [47] Comparative Transcriptional Profiling of Two Contrasting Barley Genotypes under Salinity Stress during the Seedling Stage
    Gao, Runhong
    Duan, Ke
    Guo, Guimei
    Du, Zhizhao
    Chen, Zhiwei
    Li, Liang
    He, Ting
    Lu, Ruiju
    Huang, Jianhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENOMICS, 2013, 2013
  • [48] Comparative Physiological and Transcriptomic Profiling Reveals the Characteristics of Tissue Tolerance Mechanisms in the japonica Rice Landrace Under Salt Stress
    Fauzia, Anisa Nazera
    Nampei, Mami
    Jiadkong, Kamonthip
    Shinta
    Sreewongchai, Tanee
    Ueda, Akihiro
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2024, 43 (10) : 3729 - 3742
  • [49] Physiological, Biochemical, Epigenetic and Molecular Analyses of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Genotypes with Contrasting Salt Tolerance
    Kumar, Suresh
    Beena, A. S.
    Awana, Monika
    Singh, Archana
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 8
  • [50] Comparative Transcriptome Profiling of Two Contrasting Foxtail Millet Cultivars Provides Insights into Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Dehydration Stress Response
    Mehanathan Muthamilarasan
    Bonthala Venkata Suresh
    Roshan Kumar Singh
    Pooja Choudhary
    Pooja Rani Aggarwal
    Manoj Prasad
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2023, 42 : 6425 - 6443