Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme

被引:12
作者
do Nascimento Tavares, S. B. [1 ]
de Sousa, N. L. A. [1 ]
Manrique, E. J. C. [1 ]
de Albuquerque, Z. B. P. [1 ]
Zeferino, L. C. [2 ]
Amaral, R. G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Pharm, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Campinas, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Pharm, Goiania, Go, Brazil
关键词
rapid pre-screening; quality control; quality improvement; cervical cancer; cervical screening; false-negative;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00562.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the performance of rapid pre-screening (RPS) as a method of internal quality control in the cytopathological examination of cervical smears for cervical cancer screening. Methods: The sample consisted of 6135 cervical smears submitted to RPS and routine screening (RS) methods. The smears classified as negative in RPS and RS were considered final diagnoses, and were not, therefore, submitted to any additional review. The smears identified as suspect or unsatisfactory according to RPS were analysed separately by two different cytologists irrespective of the diagnosis reached in RS. Smears considered abnormal or unsatisfactory at RS were also reviewed. When both cytologists issued concordant diagnoses, this was considered the final diagnosis. Discordant results were analysed by a third cytologist and a consensus meeting was held to define the final diagnosis. Results: Taking abnormalities detected by RS as the denominator, RPS had a sensitivity of 63.0% for the detection of all abnormal smears and 96.7% for high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). When compared with the final diagnosis, sensitivity of RPS for all abnormal smears was 74.9% and for HSIL 95.0%. Of the 529 abnormal smears confirmed in the final diagnosis, 2.15% were detected only by the RPS. Conclusion: RPS is an effective alternative method of internal quality control with high sensitivity for the detection of more severe lesions. It also permits monitoring of the laboratory rate of false-negative results, and allows constant evaluation of the performance both of the pre-screening and RS cytologists.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 259
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Quality assurance in cervical smears - 100% rapid rescreening vs. 10% random rescreening [J].
Amaral, RG ;
Zeferino, LC ;
Hardy, E ;
Westin, MCD ;
Martinez, EZ ;
Montemor, EB .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2005, 49 (03) :244-248
[2]  
[Anonymous], JAMA
[3]  
[Anonymous], JAMA
[4]   Metaanalysis of the accuracy of rapid prescreening relative to full screening of pap smears [J].
Arbyn, M ;
Schenck, U ;
Ellison, E ;
Hanselaar, A .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 99 (01) :9-16
[5]   Detection of false negative pap smears by rapid reviewing - A metaanalysis [J].
Arbyn, M ;
Schenck, U .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2000, 44 (06) :949-957
[6]   ROLE OF RE-SCREENING OF CERVICAL SMEARS IN INTERNAL QUALITY-CONTROL [J].
BAKER, A ;
MELCHER, D ;
SMITH, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1995, 48 (11) :1002-1004
[7]   RAPID CERVICAL CYTOLOGY SCREENING [J].
BAKER, A ;
MELCHER, DH .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 2 (06) :299-301
[8]   Rapid (partial) prescreening of cervical smears: the quality control method of choice? [J].
Brooke, D ;
Dudding, N ;
Sutton, J .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) :191-199
[9]  
Cocchi V, 1997, DIAGN CYTOPATHOL, V16, P87, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199701)16:1<87::AID-DC19>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-B