How You Talk About It Matters: Cultural Variation in Communication Directness in Romantic Relationships

被引:11
作者
Ge, Fiona [1 ]
Park, Jiyoung [2 ]
Pietromonaco, Paula R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Univ Texas Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
关键词
culture; communication directness; interdependence versus independence; romantic relationships; relationship quality; CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS; IMPLICIT INDEPENDENCE; SELF-DISCLOSURE; UNITED-STATES; EMOTIONS; SUPPRESSION; EXPRESSION; ADJUSTMENT; CONFLICT; PARTNERS;
D O I
10.1177/00220221221088934
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Communication plays an integral role in shaping romantic relationship quality. Yet, little is known about whether people from different cultural backgrounds communicate differently in their romantic relationships. Here, we addressed this issue by examining (a) whether the extent to which individuals communicate directly or indirectly in their romantic relationships varies by culture, (b) what mechanism underlies these cultural differences, and (c) how the fit between culture and communication style contributes to expected relationship satisfaction. Three key findings emerged across three studies (total N = 1,193). First, Chinese preferred indirect (vs. direct) communication more than European Americans, and this effect was more strongly pronounced in positively (vs. negatively) valenced situations (Studies 1-3). Second, interdependent (vs. independent) self-construal mediated the cultural difference in indirect communication both in positive and negative situations (Study 3). Finally, both cultural groups anticipated greater relationship satisfaction when they imagined their partner using the culturally preferred mode of communication-that is, indirect communication for Chinese and direct communication for European Americans (Study 3). These findings advance theory on culture and romantic relationship processes by demonstrating cultural differences in preferred communication styles across different situational contexts, identifying self-construal differences underlying these preferred communication styles, and highlighting the importance of congruence between culture and communication style for the quality of relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 602
页数:20
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Verbal and nonverbal methods for expressing appreciation in friendships and romantic relationships: A cross-cultural comparison [J].
Bello, Richard S. ;
Brandau-Brown, Frances E. ;
Zhang, Shuangyue ;
Ragsdale, J. Donald .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS, 2010, 34 (03) :294-302
[2]   Suppression and Expression as Distinct Emotion-Regulation Processes in Daily Interactions: Longitudinal and Meta-Analyses [J].
Cameron, Linda D. ;
Overall, Nickola C. .
EMOTION, 2018, 18 (04) :465-480
[3]   Incorporating the Cultural Diversity of Family and Close Relationships Into the Study of Health [J].
Campos, Belinda ;
Kim, Heejung S. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 72 (06) :543-554
[4]   What is the Role of Culture in the Association of Relationships with Health? [J].
Campos, Belinda .
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2015, 9 (12) :661-677
[5]   Suppression and Expression of Emotion in Social and Interpersonal Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Chervonsky, Elizabeth ;
Hunt, Caroline .
EMOTION, 2017, 17 (04) :669-683
[6]  
Chua E.G., 1987, Communication Research Reports, V4, P32, DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/17464099.1987.12290166
[7]  
Clark MS., 2012, Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 2 Internet, P232, DOI [10.4135/9781446249222.n38, DOI 10.4135/9781446249222.N38]
[8]  
Cross S.E., 2018, PSYCHOL CULTURAL FDN, P353, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199348541.003.0012
[9]   Culture and positive illusions in close relationships: How my relationships are better than yours [J].
Endo, Y ;
Heine, SJ ;
Lehman, DR .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2000, 26 (12) :1571-1586
[10]   Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Buchner, Axel ;
Lang, Albert-Georg .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :1149-1160