Water Relations and Transpiration of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Under Salinity and Soil Drying

被引:117
|
作者
Razzaghi, F. [1 ]
Ahmadi, S. H. [2 ]
Adolf, V. I. [3 ]
Jensen, C. R. [3 ]
Jacobsen, S. -E. [3 ]
Andersen, M. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Fac Agr Sci, Dept Agroecol & Environm, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[2] Shiraz Univ, Fac Agr, Irrigat Dept, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Life Sci, Dept Agr & Ecol, Taastrup, Denmark
关键词
apparent root resistance; critical point of irrigation; drought; leaf water potential; stomatal conductance; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; STOMATAL CONTROL; PLANT-RESPONSES; SALT TOLERANCE; USE EFFICIENCY; ABSCISIC-ACID; GROWTH; RESISTANCE; DROUGHT; CROP;
D O I
10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00473.x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Drought and salinity are the two major factors limiting crop growth and production in arid and semi-arid regions. The separate and combined effects of salinity and progressive drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) were studied in a greenhouse experiment. Stomatal conductance (gs), leaf water potential (Psi(1)), shoot and root abscisic acid concentration ([ABA]) and transpiration rate were measured in full irrigation (FI; around 95 % of water holding capacity (WHC)) and progressive drought (PD) treatments using the irrigation water with five salinity levels (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 dS m(-1)); the treatments are referred to as FI0, FI10, FI20, FI30, FI40; PD0, PD10, PD20, PD30, PD40, respectively. The measurements were carried out over 9 days of continuous drought. The results showed that increasing salinity levels decreased the total soil water potential (Psi(T)) and consequently decreased g(s) and Psi(1) values in both FI and PD. During the drought period, the xylem [ABA] extracted from the shoots increased faster than that extracted from the roots. A reduction in Psi(T), caused by salinity and soil drying, reduced transpiration and increased apparent root resistance (R) to water uptake, especially in PD0 and PD40 during the last days of the drought period. The reasons for the increase in apparent root resistance are discussed. At the end of the drought period, the minimum value of relative available soil water (RAW) was reached in PD0. Under non-saline conditions, Psi(1) decreased sharply when RAW reached 0.42 or lower, but under the saline conditions of PD10 and PD20, the threshold values of RAW were 0.67 and 0.96, respectively. In conclusion, due to the additive effect of osmotic and matric potential during soil drying on soil water availability, quinoa should be re-irrigated at higher RAW in salt-affected soils, i.e. before the soil water content reaches the critical threshold level causing the drop in Psi(1) resulting in stomatal closure.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 360
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors
    Jacobsen, SE
    Mujica, A
    Jensen, CR
    FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (1-2) : 99 - 109
  • [32] Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), a potential new crop for Pakistan
    Jacobsen, SE
    Hollington, PA
    Hussain, Z
    PROSPECTS FOR SALINE AGRICULTURE, 2002, 37 : 247 - 249
  • [33] Stability Parameters and AMMI Analysis of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Ali, Mohamed
    Elsadek, Ashraf
    Salem, Emad Mohamed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2018, 40 (01): : 59 - 74
  • [34] Silicon mitigates nutritional stress in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Sales, Ana Carolina
    Silva Campos, Cid Naudi
    de Souza Junior, Jonas Pereira
    da Silva, Dalila Lopes
    Oliveira, Kamilla Silva
    de Mello Prado, Renato
    Ribeiro Teodoro, Larissa Pereira
    Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [35] Hydration kinetics of four quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) varieties
    Pumacahua Ramos, Augusto
    Limaylla Guerrero, Katherine Milusca
    Romero, Javier Telis
    Lopes Filho, Jose Francisco
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE INVESTIGACIONES AGROINDUSTRIALES, 2016, 3 : 23 - 33
  • [36] Some Agronomic Strategies for Organic Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Jacobsen, S. -E.
    Christiansen, J. L.
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 202 (06) : 454 - 463
  • [37] Effect of Sprouting on Proteins and Starch in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Diego Suárez-Estrella
    Andrea Bresciani
    Stefania Iametti
    Mauro Marengo
    Maria Ambrogina Pagani
    Alessandra Marti
    Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 2020, 75 : 635 - 641
  • [38] Survey of enzyme activities in desaponified quinoa Chenopodium quinoa Willd.
    Caussette, M
    Kershaw, JL
    Shelton, DR
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1997, 60 (04) : 587 - 592
  • [39] PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND NUTRITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS AND USES OF QUINOA (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Borges, Joao T.
    Bonomo, Renata C.
    Paula, Claudia D.
    Oliveira, Ludmilla C.
    Cesario, Marcia C.
    TEMAS AGRARIOS, 2010, 15 (01): : 9 - 23
  • [40] Current production and potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in Peru
    Mujica, A
    Marca, S
    Jacobsen, SE
    FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (1-2) : 149 - 154