Centering Equity in Teacher Education Evaluation: From Principles to Transformative Enactment

被引:7
作者
Cochran-Smith, Marilyn [1 ]
Reagan, Emilie Mitescu [2 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Lynch Sch Educ & Human Dev, Teacher Educ, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
[2] Claremont Grad Univ, Sch Educ Studies, Educ, Claremont, CA USA
关键词
Teacher education evaluation; Teacher education accountability; Equity; Strong equity; FRAMEWORK; WHITENESS; STANDARDS;
D O I
10.1177/00224871221123728
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Since the early 2000s, accountability and evaluation have been regarded by policymakers as key mechanisms for "fixing" teacher education and by many teacher education leaders as vehicles for elevating the status of the profession and uniting a fragmented field. Although educational inequity has been an enduring and endemic problem during the same time period, most major policy proposals regarding teacher education evaluation and accountability have said very little about equity. This article makes an argument for equity-centered teacher education evaluation and accountability by highlighting nine innovative examples that collectively illustrate what it means and what it looks like to position equity at the center of teacher education evaluation/accountability. Together, these examples are intended to be generative, providing a lens into how the interrelated dimensions of strong equity-centered evaluation play out at different sites of practice and how equity initiatives emerge and operate at different levels of policy.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 462
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Akiba M., 2009, IMPROVING TEACHER QU
[2]  
Alkin M.C., 2004, EVALUATION ROOTS TRA
[3]  
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, 2022, CONS RES BAS EQ ASS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, M HIGHL QUAL TEACH C
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, REDISTRIBUTION RECOG
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, PREP TEACH BUILD EV
[7]  
Association for Advancing Quality in Educator Preparation, 2022, AAQEP STAND GUID
[8]   What Data and Measures Should Inform Teacher Preparation? Reclaiming Accountability [J].
Bartell, Tonya ;
Floden, Robert ;
Richmond, Gail .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2018, 69 (05) :426-428
[9]   Substance and show: Understanding responses to teacher education programme accreditation processes [J].
Bell, Courtney A. ;
Youngs, Peter .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2011, 27 (02) :298-307
[10]  
Brabeck M., 2013, ED WEEK