Impact of Practice Facilitation in Primary Care on Chronic Disease Care Processes and Outcomes: a Systematic Review

被引:68
作者
Wang, Andrew [1 ,2 ]
Pollack, Teresa [1 ]
Kadziel, Lauren A. [1 ]
Ross, Samuel M. [1 ]
McHugh, Megan [2 ,3 ]
Jordan, Neil [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kho, Abel N. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Inst Publ Hlth & Med, Ctr Hlth Informat Partnerships, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Inst Publ Hlth & Med, Ctr Healthcare Studies, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Behav Sci & Prevent Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Hines VA Hosp, Ctr Innovat Complex Chron Healthcare, Hines, IL USA
[7] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
primary care; practice facilitation; chronic disease; systematic review; quality improvement; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; PREVENTIVE SERVICE DELIVERY; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; DIABETES CARE; MEDICAL HOME; QUALITY; INTERVENTION; GUIDELINES; IMPLEMENTATION; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-018-4581-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundMore than 100 million individuals in the USA have been diagnosed with a chronic disease, yet chronic disease care has remained fragmented and of inconsistent quality. Improving chronic disease management has been challenging for primary care and internal medicine practitioners. Practice facilitation provides a comprehensive approach to chronic disease care. The objective is to evaluate the impact of practice facilitation on chronic disease outcomes in the primary care setting.MethodsThis systematic review examined North American studies from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (database inception to August 2017). Investigators independently extracted and assessed the quality of the data on chronic disease process and clinical outcome measures. Studies implemented practice facilitation and reported quantifiable care processes and patient outcomes for chronic disease. Each study and their evidence were assessed for risk of bias and quality according to the Cochrane Collaboration and the Grade Collaboration tool.ResultsThis systematic review included 25 studies: 12 randomized control trials and 13 prospective cohort studies. Across all studies, practices and their clinicians were aware of the implementation of practice facilitation. Improvements were observed in most studies for chronic diseases including asthma, cancer (breast, cervical, and colorectal), cardiovascular disease (cerebrovascular disease, coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, hypertension, myocardial infarction, and peripheral vascular disease), and type 2 diabetes. Mixed results were observed for chronic kidney disease and chronic illness care.DiscussionOverall, the results suggest that practice facilitation may improve chronic disease care measures. Across all studies, practices were aware of practice facilitation. These findings lend support for the potential expansion of practice facilitation in primary care. Future work will need to investigate potential opportunities for practice facilitation to improve chronic disease outcomes in other health care settings (e.g., specialty and multi-specialty practices) with standardized measures.
引用
收藏
页码:1968 / 1977
页数:10
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool Software
  • [2] [Anonymous], PATIENT EXPERIENCE P
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, PRACT FAC
  • [4] [Anonymous], CANC SCREEN TESTS
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, Diabetes Care, V25, pS33
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, REV MAN REVMAN VERS
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2007, EXPERT PANEL REPORT
  • [8] [Anonymous], CMS QUAL MEAS INV
  • [9] [Anonymous], DEATH AND MORT
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2014, MULTIPLE CHRONIC CON