Between innovation and restoration; towards a critical-historicizing understanding of social innovation niches

被引:32
作者
Pel, Bonno [1 ]
Kemp, Rene [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Ctr Etud Dev Durable, Inst Gest Environm & Amenagement Terr, Room DB-6-250,50 Ave FD Roosevelt, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Maastricht Univ, Int Ctr Integrated Assessment & Sustainable Dev I, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Social innovation; Strategic niche Management; innovation history; reinvention; GRASS-ROOTS INNOVATIONS; SUSTAINABILITY; TYPOLOGY; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2020.1750588
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Social innovation (SI) is gaining attention as an innovation category. However, the SI concept proves vulnerable to stereotypical understandings. Next to the radically novel, diffusion-oriented and thereby manifestly innovative social 'niches', it is important to also acknowledge the rather latent SI phenomena of restoration and shielding. This paper therefore develops a critical-historicizing perspective that highlights the social construction of innovations in social relations. Building on scholarship in Strategic Niche Management, grassroots innovation and critical innovation studies, four 'shapes of social innovation' are distinguished. Substantiating and deepening this conceptual classification through empirical evidence on 20 SI initiatives, the analysis highlights how social innovations may take on several of the theorised appearances throughout their existence in society (shapeshifting). Disclosing overlooked SI phenomena, this critical-historicizing understanding informs more comprehensive and balanced SI research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1182 / 1194
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Amanatidou E., 2018, MIOIRMBS WORKING PAP, V82
[2]   Translocal empowerment in transformative social innovation networks [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Dumitru, Adina ;
Cipolla, Carla ;
Kunze, Iris ;
Wittmayer, Julia .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2020, 28 (05) :955-977
[3]   Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Wittmayer, Julia M. ;
Pel, Bonno ;
Weaver, Paul ;
Dumitru, Adina ;
Haxeltine, Alex ;
Kemp, Rene ;
Jorgensen, Michael S. ;
Bauler, Tom ;
Ruijsink, Saskia ;
O'Riordan, Tim .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 145 :195-206
[4]   How Social Innovation 'Came to Be': Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept [J].
Ayob, Noorseha ;
Teasdale, Simon ;
Fagan, Kylie .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2016, 45 (04) :635-653
[5]  
Balazs B., 2018, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, V24, P336
[6]   Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework [J].
Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2014, 82 :42-51
[7]  
Chiffoleau Y., 2018, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, V24, P306
[8]   Putting Typologies to Work: Concept Formation, Measurement, and Analytic Rigor [J].
Collier, David ;
LaPorte, Jody ;
Seawright, Jason .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2012, 65 (01) :217-232
[9]   The tactical mimicry of social enterprise strategies: Acting "as if' in the everyday life of third sector organizations [J].
Dey, Pascal ;
Teasdale, Simon .
ORGANIZATION, 2016, 23 (04) :485-504
[10]   Exploring the transition potential of renewable energy communities [J].
Doci, Gabriella ;
Vasileiadou, Eleftheria ;
Petersen, Arthur C. .
FUTURES, 2015, 66 :85-95