Key factors influencing the implementation success of a home telecare application

被引:34
作者
Postema, T. R. F. [1 ]
Peeters, J. M. [2 ]
Friele, R. D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Operat Org & Human Resources, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, NIVEL, NL-3500 BN Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Fac Social & Behav Sci, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Innovation; Adoption; Home telecare; Implementation; Homecare organization; HEALTH-CARE; INFORMATION-SYSTEMS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; TELEHEALTH; ORGANIZATIONS; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.12.003
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Rationale: The introduction of home telecare in healthcare organizations has shown mixed results in practice. The aim of this study is to arrive at a set of key factors that can be used in further implementation of video communication. We argue that key factors are mainly found in the organizational climate for home telecare implementation, the characteristics of the implementation strategy and the available technology. Methods: Interviews were conducted in three care organizations with 27 respondents of different levels within and outside the organization. Implementation determinants, based on earlier research, were used as a categorization framework for the interviews. Results: We found that most prominent factors influencing implementation outcomes relate to the stability of the technical and the external environment and the alignment of organization, goals and implementation strategy. Conclusion: Because of the experimental nature of implementing video communication, attention to telecare influencers has been inconsistent and disorganized but it is becoming increasingly important. According to the respondents, a champion-led roll-out is imperative for implementation in order to advance to the next stage in home telecare and to organize services for substitution of care. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 423
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Evaluation of health information systems-problems and challenges [J].
Ammenwerth, E ;
Gräber, S ;
Herrmann, G ;
Bürkle, T ;
König, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2003, 71 (2-3) :125-135
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Diffusion of innovations
[3]   Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: Experiences of 'telecare' [J].
Barlow, J ;
Bayer, S ;
Curry, R .
TECHNOVATION, 2006, 26 (03) :396-406
[4]   Flexible homes, flexible care, inflexible organisations? The role of telecare in supporting independence [J].
Barlow, J ;
Bayer, S ;
Curry, R .
HOUSING STUDIES, 2005, 20 (03) :441-456
[5]   Assessing the impact of a care innovation: telecare [J].
Bayer, Steffen ;
Barlow, James ;
Curry, Richard .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2007, 23 (01) :61-80
[6]  
Cain M., 2002, Diffusion of Innovation in Health Care
[7]  
Cho S., 2007, A contextualist approach to telehealth innovations
[8]  
Dansky Kathryn H, 2002, Caring, V21, P18
[9]   Qualitative analysis of telehomecare nursing activities [J].
Dansky, KH ;
Yant, B ;
Jenkins, D ;
Dellasega, C .
JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2003, 33 (7-8) :372-375
[10]   Cost analysis of telehomecare [J].
Dansky, KH ;
Palmer, L ;
Shea, D ;
Bowles, KH .
TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2001, 7 (03) :225-232