Attitudes, skills and use of evidence-based practice among UK osteopaths: a national cross-sectional survey

被引:41
作者
Sundberg, Tobias [1 ,2 ]
Leach, Matthew J. [1 ,3 ]
Thomson, Oliver P. [4 ,5 ]
Austin, Philip [6 ]
Fryer, Gary [7 ]
Adams, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, ARCCIM, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Musculoskeletal & Sports Injury Epidemiol Ctr MUS, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ South Australia, Dept Rural Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Coll Osteopathy, London, England
[5] Ctr Osteopath Med Collaborat COME, Clin Based Human Res Dept, Pescara, Italy
[6] Greenwich Hosp, Dept Pain Management, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Victoria Univ, Inst Hlth & Sport, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS | 2018年 / 19卷
关键词
Evidence-based practice; Osteopathy; Cross-sectional survey; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; PHYSICAL-THERAPISTS; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; COMPLEMENTARY; KNOWLEDGE; HEALTH; CARE; PRACTITIONERS; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-018-2354-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEvidence-based practice (EBP) is a clinical decision-making framework that supports quality improvement in healthcare. While osteopaths are key providers of musculoskeletal healthcare, the extent to which osteopaths engage in EBP is unclear. Thus, the aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate UK osteopaths' attitudes, skills and use of EBP, and perceived barriers and facilitators of EBP uptake.MethodsUK-registered osteopaths were invited to complete the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude and Utilisation Survey (EBASE) online.ResultsOf the 5200 registered osteopaths in the UK, 9.9% (517/5200) responded to the invitation, and 7.2% (375/5200) completed the EBASE (<20% incomplete answers). The demographic characteristics of the survey sample were largely similar to those of the UK osteopathy workforce. The osteopaths reported overall positive attitudes towards EBP, with most agreeing that EBP improves the quality of patient care (69.3%) and is necessary for osteopathy practice (76.5%). The majority reported moderate-level skills in EBP, and most (80.8%) were interested in improving these skills. Participating osteopaths typically engaged in EBP activities 1-5 times over the last month. Barriers to EBP uptake included a lack of time and clinical evidence in osteopathy. Main facilitators of EBP included having access to online databases, internet at work, full-text articles, and EBP education materials.ConclusionsUK osteopaths were generally supportive of evidence-based practice, had moderate-level skills in EBP and engaged in EBP activities infrequently. The development of effective interventions that improve osteopaths' skills and the incorporation of EBP into clinical practice should be the focus of future research.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] CHIROPRACTIC ATTITUDES AND UTILIZATION OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: THE USE OF THE EBASE QUESTIONNAIRE
    Alcantara, Joel
    Leach, Matthew J.
    [J]. EXPLORE-THE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND HEALING, 2015, 11 (05) : 367 - 376
  • [2] *AM OST ASS, OST MED PROF REP 200
  • [3] American Osteopathic Association, 2017, OST MED PROF REP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, GOSC OST OP SURV 201
  • [5] [Anonymous], OSTEOPATHY TODAY
  • [6] Bithell C., 2000, Physiotherapy, V80, P58, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61206-0
  • [7] Bussieres Andre E, 2015, J Can Chiropr Assoc, V59, P332
  • [8] Osteopathic principles in the modern world
    Cotton, Andrew
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, 2013, 16 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [9] What do physical therapists think about evidence-based practice? A systematic review
    da Silva, Tatiane Mota
    Menezes Costa, Luciola da Cunha
    Garcia, Alessandra Narciso
    Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2015, 20 (03) : 388 - 401
  • [10] Evidence-based practice for individuals or groups: let's make a difference
    de Groot, M.
    van der Wouden, J. M.
    van Hell, E. A.
    Nieweg, M. B.
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 2 (04) : 216 - 221