Relationship between leadership personality types and source of power and leadership styles among managers

被引:0
作者
Yahaya, Noordin [2 ]
Taib, Mohammad Aslan B. Mohammad [2 ]
Ismail, Jasmi [2 ]
Shariff, Zainudin [2 ]
Yahaya, Azizi [1 ]
Boon, Yusof [1 ]
Hashim, Sharin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknologi Malaysia, Fac Educ, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknologi Mara Melaka, Fac Business & Managrment, Shah Alam, Malaysia
来源
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT | 2011年 / 5卷 / 22期
关键词
Leadership styles; power styles; leader personality; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP; SOCIAL POWER; PERFORMANCE; BASES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to indentify the relationship between power style, personality dimension and Leadership style. The sample of this study consists of 300 respondents from six selected company and were chosen by using simple random sampling. Quantitative method was used in this study and the data was collected by using questionnaire which consist of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQx5), Rahim Power Inventory (RLPI) and Big Five Personality Questionnaire (BFPQ). This questionnaire was used to answer the research questions of leadership style based on leaders' power and leaders' personality among the managers. The reliability of the questionnaire was done by using Cronbach alpha to find the internal consistency of the questionnaire through pilot study and it shows that the alpha ranged between 0.71 and 0.874. The result of this study shows that there was a positive correlation between transformational leadership style and expert and referent powers (r = 0.694 and r = 0.544, respectively), negative correlation between transformational leadership style and legitimate power, coercive and reward powers (r = -0.428, 0.537, and -0.470 respectively), positive correlation between transactional leadership style and reward power (r = 0.205). A result also shows that agreeableness, conscientiousness and openness to experience had a positive correlation with transformational leadership style (r = 0.268, 0.575 and 0.130, respectively). This study shows that expert power, conscientiousness and coercive power predicted transformational leadership in the organization (beta = 0.464, 0.266 and -0.145, respectively). Conversely, reward power predicted to transactional leadership (beta = 0.205).
引用
收藏
页码:9635 / 9648
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Aldoory L., 2004, J PUBLIC RELAT RES, V16, P157, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1602_2, 10.1207/s1532754xjprr16022, 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1602_2]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1985, Leadership and performance beyond expectations
  • [3] Atwater LE, 1996, J BUS PSYCHOL, V7, P3
  • [4] Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire
    Avolio, BJ
    Bass, BM
    Jung, DI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 72 : 441 - 462
  • [5] Azizi Y, 2010, AUSTR J BASIC APPL S, V4, P1676
  • [6] Bass B.M., 1991, The multifactor leadership questionnaire: Form 5x, DOI DOI 10.1126/science.1203295
  • [7] Bass B. M., 1997, IMPROVING ORG EFFECT
  • [8] Bass B.M., 1981, J MANAGE, V7, P63
  • [9] Bass BernardM., 1990, Journal of European Industrial Training, V14, P21, DOI [10.1108/03090599010135122, DOI 10.1108/03090599010135122]
  • [10] The relationship between individual personality orientation and executive leadership behaviour
    Church, AH
    Waclawski, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 71 : 99 - 125