Docking Performance of Fragments and Drug like Compounds

被引:100
作者
Verdonk, Marcel L. [1 ]
Giangreco, Ilenia [1 ,3 ]
Hall, Richard J. [1 ]
Korb, Oliver [2 ]
Mortenson, Paul N. [1 ]
Murray, Christopher W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Astex Therapeut Ltd, Cambridge CB4 0QA, England
[2] Cambridge Crystallog Data Ctr, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, England
[3] Univ Bari, Dipartimento Farm Chim, I-70125 Bari, Italy
关键词
PROTEIN-LIGAND DOCKING; EMPIRICAL SCORING FUNCTIONS; FLEXIBLE DOCKING; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; BINDING-AFFINITY; CROSS-DOCKING; VALIDATION; COMPLEXES; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1021/jm200558u
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
This paper addresses two questions of key interest to researchers working with protein ligand docking methods: (i) Why is there such a large variation in docking performance between different test sets reported in the literature? (ii) Are fragments more difficult to dock than druglike compounds? To answer these, we construct a test set of in-house X-ray structures of protein-ligand complexes from drug discovery projects, half of which contain fragment ligands, the other half druglike ligands. We find that a key factor affecting docking performance is ligand efficiency (LE). High LE compounds are significantly easier to dock than low LE compounds, which we believe could explain the differences observed between test sets reported in the literature. There is no significant difference in docking performance between fragments and druglike compounds, but the reasons why dockings fail appear to be different.
引用
收藏
页码:5422 / 5431
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   ICM - A NEW METHOD FOR PROTEIN MODELING AND DESIGN - APPLICATIONS TO DOCKING AND STRUCTURE PREDICTION FROM THE DISTORTED NATIVE CONFORMATION [J].
ABAGYAN, R ;
TOTROV, M ;
KUZNETSOV, D .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 15 (05) :488-506
[2]  
Baxter CA, 1998, PROTEINS, V33, P367, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19981115)33:3<367::AID-PROT6>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-W
[4]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[5]  
*BIOBYTE CORP, 2006, SOFTW BIOBYTE CORP
[6]   Four-Dimensional Docking: A Fast and Accurate Account of Discrete Receptor Flexibility in Ligand Docking [J].
Bottegoni, Giovanni ;
Kufareva, Irina ;
Totrov, Maxim ;
Abagyan, Ruben .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 52 (02) :397-406
[7]  
Case D.A., 2006, AMBER 9
[8]   A rule of three for fragment-based lead discovery? [J].
Congreve, M ;
Carr, R ;
Murray, C ;
Jhoti, H .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2003, 8 (19) :876-877
[9]   A 2ND GENERATION FORCE-FIELD FOR THE SIMULATION OF PROTEINS, NUCLEIC-ACIDS, AND ORGANIC-MOLECULES [J].
CORNELL, WD ;
CIEPLAK, P ;
BAYLY, CI ;
GOULD, IR ;
MERZ, KM ;
FERGUSON, DM ;
SPELLMEYER, DC ;
FOX, T ;
CALDWELL, JW ;
KOLLMAN, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1995, 117 (19) :5179-5197
[10]   A structural comparison of inhibitor binding to PKB, PKA and PKA-PKB chimera [J].
Davies, Thomas G. ;
Verdonk, Marcel L. ;
Graham, Brent ;
Saalau-Bethell, Susanne ;
Hamlett, Christopher C. F. ;
McHardy, Tatiana ;
Collins, Ian ;
Garrett, Michelle D. ;
Workman, Paul ;
Woodhead, Steven J. ;
Jhoti, Harren ;
Barford, David .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2007, 367 (03) :882-894