Comparative reproducibility of TELOS™ and GNRB® for instrumental measurement of anterior tibial translation in normal knees

被引:29
作者
Bouguennec, N. [1 ]
Odri, G. A. [2 ]
Graveleau, N. [3 ]
Colombet, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Nantes, Clin Chirurg Traumatol & Orthoped, F-44000 Nantes, France
[2] CHR Orleans, Serv Chirurg Orthoped, F-45000 Orleans, France
[3] Clin Sport Bordeaux Merignac, F-33700 Merignac, France
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior tibial translation; Laximetry; GNRB (R); TELOS (TM); KT-1000; ARTHROMETER; STRESS RADIOGRAPHY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; LAXITY; DIAGNOSIS; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.007
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: TELOS(TM) is among the reference tools for the instrumental measurement of anterior tibial translation during the initial work-up and follow-up of patients with injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). GRNB(R) is a non-irradiating but recently developed tool for which only limited data are available. Hypothesis: The GRNB(R) offers better reproducibility than TELOS(TM) for measuring anterior tibial translation without rotation in normal knees. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated instrumental laxity measurements in normal knees. Data were available for 60 TELOS(TM) measurements (9 kg load) and 57 GNRB(R) measurements (89 N and 134 N loads). For each instrument, we compared the absolute variation in anterior tibial translation between two measurements performed 6 months apart. For each GNRB(R) measurement, patellar pressure was recorded. Results: No significant differences were found between mean (+/- SD) variations in translation between the two instruments. A greater than 2.5 mm variation between the two measurements was significantly more common with TELOS(TM) than with GRNB(R) (P < 0.05, Chi(2) test). GRNB(R) translation values did not correlate with patellar pressure. Discussion: The GNRB(R) device offers greater reproducibility than TELOS(TM) when used to quantitate anterior tibial translation. The limited sample size may have prevented the detection of a significant difference between mean values. In addition, disadvantages of the TELOS(TM) include radiation exposure of the patient, operator-dependency of measurements made on the radiographs, and absence of a biofeedback system to limit hamstring contraction. GNRB(R) does have hamstring contraction biofeedback control but uses another parameter, namely, patellar pressure, for which the optimal value is unknown. Quadriceps and hamstring co-contraction induced by excessive patellar pressure may influence anterior tibial translation. The optimal patellar pressure value needs to be determined. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 305
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   INSTRUMENTED EVALUATION OF KNEE LAXITY - A COMPARISON OF 5 ARTHROMETERS [J].
ANDERSON, AF ;
SNYDER, RB ;
FEDERSPIEL, CF ;
LIPSCOMB, AB ;
GRANA, WA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1992, 20 (02) :135-140
[2]  
[Anonymous], KNEE SURG SPORTS TRA
[3]   INFLUENCE OF EXAMINER EXPERIENCE AND GENDER ON INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF KT-1000 ARTHROMETER MEASUREMENTS [J].
BALLANTYNE, BT ;
FRENCH, AK ;
HEIMSOTH, SL ;
KACHINGWE, AF ;
LEE, JB ;
SODERBERG, GL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 75 (10) :898-906
[4]   Clinical practice guidelines for the management of meniscal lesions and isolated lesions of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee in adults [J].
Beaufils, P. ;
Hulet, C. ;
Dhenain, M. ;
Nizard, R. ;
Nourissat, G. ;
Pujol, N. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2009, 95 (06) :437-442
[5]   Laxity measurements using stress radiography to assess anterior cruciate ligament tears [J].
Beldame, J. ;
Bertiaux, S. ;
Roussignol, X. ;
Lefebvre, B. ;
Adam, J. -M. ;
Mouilhade, F. ;
Dujardin, F. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2011, 97 (01) :34-43
[6]  
BERCOVY M, 1995, REV CHIR ORTHOP, V81, P114
[7]   Reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer (Medmetric) for measuring anterior knee laxity: comparison with Telos in 147 knees [J].
Boyer, P ;
Djian, R ;
Christel, R ;
Paoletti, X ;
Degeorges, R .
REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 2004, 90 (08) :757-764
[8]   Instrumented Examination of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Minimizing Flaws of the Manual Clinical Examination [J].
Branch, Thomas P. ;
Mayr, Hermann O. ;
Browne, Jon E. ;
Campbell, John C. ;
Stoehr, Amelie ;
Jacobs, Cale A. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2010, 26 (07) :997-1004
[9]   Objective evaluation of anterior knee laxity; comparison of the KT-1000 and GNRB® arthrometers [J].
Collette, Michel ;
Courville, Julie ;
Forton, Marc ;
Gagniere, Bertrand .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2012, 20 (11) :2233-2238
[10]   Biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament and implications for surgical reconstruction [J].
Dargel, J. ;
Gotter, M. ;
Mader, K. ;
Pennig, D. ;
Koebke, J. ;
Schmidt-Wiethoff, R. .
STRATEGIES IN TRAUMA AND LIMB RECONSTRUCTION, 2007, 2 (01) :1-12