Scoring to predict the possibility of upgrades to malignancy in atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy device: An external validation study

被引:27
作者
Bendifallah, S. [1 ,2 ]
Defert, S. [3 ]
Chabbert-Buffet, N. [1 ]
Maurin, N. [4 ]
Chopier, J. [4 ]
Antoine, M. [5 ]
Bezu, C. [1 ]
Touche, D. [6 ]
Uzan, S. [1 ,5 ]
Graesslin, O. [3 ]
Rouzier, R. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Tenon APHP Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, F-75020 Paris, France
[2] Pierre & Marie Curie Univ, ER2, Paris, France
[3] Univ Hosp, Inst Alix Champagne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, F-51092 Reims, France
[4] Tenon APHP Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, F-75020 Paris, France
[5] Tenon APHP Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, F-75020 Paris, France
[6] Inst Jean Godinot, Breast Unit, Reims, France
[7] Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMR S 938, Paris, France
关键词
Atypical ductal hyperplasia; Mathematical models; Underestimation rate; Upgrading rate; Scoring system; Vacuum-assisted biopsy; CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY; PROLIFERATIVE BREAST DISEASE; SURGICAL EXCISION; CANCER PATIENTS; LESIONS; WOMEN; MODEL; UNDERESTIMATION; ACCURACY; RULES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Ko's scoring system was developed to predict malignancy upgrades in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia by core needle biopsy. The Ko algorithm was able to identify a subset of patients who were eligible for exclusively clinical follow-up. The current study statistically investigated the patient outcomes to determine whether this scoring system could be translated and used safely in clinical practice. Methods: We tested the statistical performance of the Ko scoring system against an external independent multicentre population. One hundred and seven cases of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by an 11-gauge biopsy needle were available for inclusion in this study. The discrimination, calibration and clinical utility of the scoring system were quantified. In addition, we tested the underestimation rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values according to the score threshold. Results: The overall underestimation rate was 19% (20/107). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the logistic regression model was 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.53). The model was not well calibrated. The lowest predicted underestimation rate was 11%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 90%, 22%, 20%, and 89%, respectively, according to the most accurate threshold proposed in the original study. Conclusion: The scoring system was not sufficiently accurate to safely define a subset of patients who would be eligible for follow-up only and no additional treatment. These results demonstrate a lack of reproducibility in an external population. A multidisciplinary approach that correlates clinicopathological and mammographic features should be recommended for the management of these patients. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Is surgical excision necessary for atypical ductal hyperplasia of the breast diagnosed by mammotome? [J].
Adrales, G ;
Turk, P ;
Wallace, T ;
Bird, R ;
Norton, HJ ;
Greene, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 180 (04) :313-315
[2]   Atypical ductal hyperplasia on vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: suspicion for ductal carcinoma in situ can stratify patients at high risk for upgrade [J].
Allison, Kimberly H. ;
Eby, Peter R. ;
Kohr, Jennifer ;
DeMartini, Wendy B. ;
Lehman, Constance D. .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 42 (01) :41-50
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, WHO CLASSIFICATION T
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[5]   Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) Model for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in Women With Atypical Hyperplasia [J].
Boughey, Judy C. ;
Hartmann, Lynn C. ;
Anderson, Stephanie S. ;
Degnim, Amy C. ;
Vierkant, Robert A. ;
Reynolds, Carol A. ;
Frost, Marlene H. ;
Pankratz, V. Shane .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (22) :3591-3596
[6]   Accuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: The florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsies [J].
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Ambrogetti, Daniela ;
Bianchi, Simonetta ;
Bonardi, Rita ;
Brancato, Beniamino ;
Catarzi, Sandra ;
Risso, Gabriella G. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 101 (03) :291-297
[7]   Comparison of Models to Predict Nonsentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients With Metastatic Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Prospective Multicenter Study [J].
Coutant, Charles ;
Olivier, Camille ;
Lambaudie, Eric ;
Fondrinier, Eric ;
Marchal, Frederic ;
Guillemin, Francois ;
Seince, Nathalie ;
Thomas, Veronique ;
Leveque, Jean ;
Barranger, Emmanuel ;
Darai, Emile ;
Uzan, Serge ;
Houvenaeghel, Gilles ;
Rouzier, Roman .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (17) :2800-2808
[8]  
COX DR, 1958, BIOMETRIKA, V45, P562, DOI 10.1093/biomet/45.3-4.562
[9]   Histological precision of stereotactic core biopsy in diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions [J].
Dahlstrom, JE ;
Sutton, S ;
Jain, S .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1996, 28 (06) :537-541
[10]   Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram [J].
Degnim, AC ;
Reynolds, C ;
Pantvaidya, G ;
Zakaria, S ;
Hoskin, T ;
Barnes, S ;
Roberts, MV ;
Lucas, PC ;
Oh, K ;
Koker, M ;
Sabel, MS ;
Newman, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 190 (04) :543-550