Electrifying Australian transport: Hybrid life cycle analysis of a transition to electric light-duty vehicles and renewable electricity

被引:65
作者
Wolfram, Paul [1 ]
Wiedmann, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, Ctr Ind Ecol, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] UNSW Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, SAP, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Multi-sectoral scenario analysis; Multi-regional input-output analysis; Hybrid life cycle assessment; Electric vehicles; Renewable energy; Real-world fuel consumption; PLUG-IN HYBRID; EMISSIONS; BATTERY; ALLOCATION; IMPACTS; ECONOMY; CARBON; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.219
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Recent life cycle assessments confirmed the greenhouse gas emission reduction potential of renewable electricity and electric vehicle technologies. However, each technology is usually assessed separately and not within a consistent macro-economic, multi-sectoral framework. Here we present a multi-regional input-output based hybrid approach with integrated scenarios to facilitate the carbon footprint assessment of all direct and indirect effects of a transition to low-emission transportation and electricity generation technologies in Australia. The work takes into account on-road energy consumption values that are more realistic than official drive-cycle energy consumption figures used in previous work. Accounting for these factors as well as for Australia's grid electricity, which heavily relies on coal power, electric vehicles are found to have a higher carbon footprint than conventional vehicles, whereas hybrid electric vehicles have the lowest. This means that from a carbon footprint perspective powertrain electrification is beneficial only to a certain degree at the current stage. This situation can be changed by increasing shares of renewable electricity in the grid. In our best-case scenario, where renewable energy accounts for 96% of the electricity mix in 2050, electric vehicle carbon footprints can be cut by 66% by 2050 relative to 2009. In the business-as-usual scenario (36% renewable electricity share by 2050), electric vehicles can reach a 56% reduction if fossil fuel power plants significantly increase their efficiencies and use carbon capture and storage technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 540
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [21] Edwards R., 2014, FUTURE AUTOMOTIVE FU
  • [22] The size and range effect: lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles
    Ellingsen, Linda Ager-Wick
    Singh, Bhawna
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [23] EVE, 2016, WHAT IS RANG ANX SHO
  • [24] Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
  • [25] Frieske B, 2015, BEGLEITFORSCHUNG TEC
  • [26] A comparative study of carbon footprint and assessment standards
    Gao, Tao
    Liu, Qing
    Wang, Jianping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 9 (03) : 237 - 243
  • [27] Gerboni R., 2008, FINAL REPORT TECHNIC
  • [28] Global Lithium Availability A Constraint for Electric Vehicles?
    Gruber, Paul W.
    Medina, Pablo A.
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    Kesler, Stephen E.
    Everson, Mark P.
    Wallington, Timothy J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 15 (05) : 760 - 775
  • [29] Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles
    Hawkins, Troy R.
    Singh, Bhawna
    Majeau-Bettez, Guillaume
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2013, 17 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [30] Humanity's unsustainable environmental footprint
    Hoekstra, Arjen Y.
    Wiedmann, Thomas O.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2014, 344 (6188) : 1114 - 1117