Social vulnerability assessment of dog intake location data as a planning tool for community health program development: A case study in Athens-Clarke County, GA, 2014-2016

被引:12
作者
Dyer, Jessie L. [1 ]
Milot, Lisa [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Vet Med, Dept Small Anim Med & Surg, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Athenspets Inc, Athens, GA USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Sch Law, Athens, GA 30602 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
ANIMAL SHELTERS; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; OVERPOPULATION; RISK; EUTHANASIA; ADOPTION; WELFARE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0225282
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A retrospective spatial analysis of dog intake data from an open admission animal shelter in Georgia was conducted to explore patterns within dog demographics and outcomes by pickup location or by the home address of the person who transferred ownership rights of the dog to Athens-Clarke County Animal Control during the period 2014-2016. Spatial analysis found the relationship between these intake locations and the final disposition of the dogs to be non-random, suggesting social and environmental influences on distribution. Statistically significant clusters were identified using the Getis-Ord Gi* statistic. This study found statistically significant hot spots (i.e., areas with higher than expected values) and cold spots (i.e., areas with lower than expected values) for the intake of dogs with known health issues, physically neglected dogs, juveniles, and adults. Only statistically significant hot spots were found for socially neglected dogs and dogs whose final disposition was euthanasia due to severe health or behavioral issues. Given the close relationship between humans and dogs, this study explores the association of impounded dog clusters and a previously developed social vulnerability index. Social vulnerability is the product of social inequalities and inequalities related to the human-built environment. The social vulnerability index provides one tool for understanding the differences in characteristics of dogs from different intake locations. Results of this study indicate the utility of non-animal focused data as a planning tool for community programs and to allow for efficient allocation of limited resources for veterinary and other community outreach programs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, DOGS CATS RELEASED A
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, OWN SURR RES LIF AN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Reducing Disaster Risk: A Challenge for Development
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CURRENT POPULATION R
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, US Pet Ownership Demographics Sourcebook
[6]   Assessing the social vulnerability to malaria in Rwanda [J].
Bizimana, Jean-Pierre ;
Twarabamenye, Emmanuel ;
Kienberger, Stefan .
MALARIA JOURNAL, 2015, 14
[7]   Emplaced social vulnerability to technological disasters: Southeast Louisiana and the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill [J].
Cope, Michael R. ;
Slack, Tim .
POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 38 (03) :217-241
[8]   Empathic response to animal suffering: Societal versus family influence [J].
Fidler, M ;
Coleman, P ;
Roberts, A .
ANTHROZOOS, 2000, 13 (01) :48-51
[9]   A Social Vulnerability Index for Disaster Management [J].
Flanagan, Barry E. ;
Gregory, Edward W. ;
Hallisey, Elaine J. ;
Heitgerd, Janet L. ;
Lewis, Brian .
JOURNAL OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 8 (01)
[10]   An interactive model of human and companion animal dynamics: The ecology and economics of dog overpopulation and the human costs of addressing the problem [J].
Frank, J .
HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2004, 32 (01) :107-130