Distraction osteogenesis in secondary microsurgical mandible reconstruction: Report of seven cases

被引:14
作者
Li, Lei [1 ]
Blake, Felix [2 ]
Gbara, Ali [2 ]
Gudewer, Eva [2 ]
Schmelzle, Rainer [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Ctr Oldenburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-26133 Oldenburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
callus distraction; secondary mandible reconstruction; revascularised bone graft;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2007.07.013
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Fibula, ilium and scapula are the preferred donor areas for vascularised bone grafts. For secondary mandibular reconstruction, however, compromises often have to be made as a result of the poor quality of the covering soft tissue and recipient vessels especially in irradiated patients. Callus distraction osteogenesis is a complementary method for optimising the intermaxillary relationship and the facial profile from an aesthetic point of view. Materials and methods: Thirteen distractions were performed in seven patients following microsurgical mandibular reconstruction over a period of 4 years, all by the same surgeon. Intra-oral distraction devices were predominately applied. After a 7-day healing period, the callus distraction was begun, involving two advisements per day of 0.5 mm each. The distraction devices were removed after a consolidation phase of 4-5 months. Results: Ten of the 13 distractions were uneventful with an average bone lengthening of 20 mm, retained after a follow-up time of 6-47 months (average 27 months). The intermaxillary relationship and the facial profile were improved in all cases. Distraction plate fractures, screw loosening or absence of new bone formation were the complications encountered in the other three patients. Conclusion: Regarding the high complication rate, a successful outcome cannot be expected with greater certainty. Thus the indication should be stringent when including this procedure within the possible treatment alternatives available to the clinician. (C) 2008 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 278
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BAKER SR, 1989, MICROSURGICAL RECONS, P159
[2]  
Daniel R K, 1978, Ann Plast Surg, V1, P346, DOI 10.1097/00000637-197807000-00002
[3]  
Fossion E, 1992, Ann Chir Plast Esthet, V37, P246
[4]   B-scan ultrasonography in the segment distraction and callus formation of the reconstructed mandible [J].
Friedrich, RE ;
Hellner, D ;
Plambeck, K ;
Schmelzle, R .
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 1997, 18 (04) :177-181
[5]  
HELLNER D, 1993, 18 C INT ASS MAX SUR
[6]   FIBULA FREE FLAP - A NEW METHOD OF MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION [J].
HIDALGO, DA .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1989, 84 (01) :71-79
[7]  
KAERCHER H, 1988, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, V26, P317
[8]   Lengthening of the reconstructed mandible using extraoral distraction devices: Report of five cases [J].
Kessler, P ;
Schultze-Mosgau, S ;
Neukam, FW ;
Wiltfang, J .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (04) :1400-1404
[9]   Vertical distraction osteogenesis of fibula transplants for mandibular reconstruction -: a preliminary study [J].
Klesper, B ;
Lazar, F ;
Siessegger, M ;
Hidding, J ;
Zöller, JE .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 30 (05) :280-285
[10]   Functional outcomes of microsurgical reconstruction of delayed complications following head and neck cancer ablation [J].
Mast, BA .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1999, 42 (01) :40-45