Prognostic models for outcome following liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases: A systematic review

被引:104
作者
Spelt, L. [1 ,3 ]
Andersson, B. [1 ,3 ]
Nilsson, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Andersson, R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Surg, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, SE-22185 Lund, Sweden
[3] Skane Univ Hosp Lund, Lund, Sweden
来源
EJSO | 2012年 / 38卷 / 01期
关键词
Liver resection; Colorectal cancer; Liver metastases; Predictive models; Prognosis; Outcome; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; HEPATIC RESECTION; SCORING SYSTEM; PREDICTING MORTALITY; SURGICAL RESECTION; SELECT CANDIDATES; NATURAL-HISTORY; 5-YEAR SURVIVAL; NEURAL-NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2011.10.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Liver resection provides the best chance for cure in colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. A variety of factors that might influence survival and recurrence have been identified. Predictive models can help in risk stratification, to determine multidisciplinary treatment and follow-up for individual patients. Aims: To systematically review available prognostic models described for outcome following resection of CRC liver metastases and to assess their differences and applicability. Methods: The Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles proposing a prognostic model or risk stratification system for resection of CRC liver metastases. Search terms included 'colorectal', 'liver', 'metastasis', 'resection', 'prognosis' and 'prediction'. The articles were systematically reviewed. Results: Fifteen prognostic systems were identified, published between 1996 and 2009. The median study population was 305 patients and the median follow-up was 32 months. All studies used Cox proportional hazards for multi-variable analysis. No prognostic factor was common in all models, though there was a tendency towards the number of metastases, CRC spread to lymph nodes, maximum size of metastases, preoperative CEA level and extrahepatic spread as representing independent risk factors. Seven models assigned more weight to selected factors considered of higher predictive value. Conclusion: The existing predictive models are diverse and their prognostic factors are often not weighed according to their impact. For the development of future predictive models, the complex relations within datasets and differences in relevance of individual factors should be taken into account, for example by using artificial neural networks. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 24
页数:9
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Abdalla EK, 2004, ANN SURG, V239, P818, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000128305.90650.71
  • [2] The importance of visceral metastasectomy in colorectal cancer
    Adam, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 : 29 - 36
  • [3] Tumor progression while on chemotherapy - A contraindication to liver resection for multiple colorectal metastases?
    Adam, R
    Pascal, G
    Castaing, D
    Azoulay, D
    Delvart, V
    Paule, B
    Levi, F
    Bismuth, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (06) : 1052 - 1064
  • [4] Adam R, 2001, ANN SURG ONCOL, V8, P347
  • [5] Two-stage hepatectomy: A planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors
    Adam, R
    Laurent, A
    Azoulay, D
    Castaing, D
    Bismuth, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (06) : 777 - 784
  • [6] Aldrighetti Luca, 2005, Chir Ital, V57, P555
  • [7] Importance of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases
    Allen, PJ
    Kemeny, N
    Jarnagin, W
    DeMatteo, R
    Blumgart, L
    Fong, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2003, 7 (01) : 109 - 115
  • [8] Altman DG, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P453, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::AID-SIM350>3.3.CO
  • [9] 2-X
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2007, Global Cancer Facts Figures