Do wild carnivores forage for prey or for nutrients?: Evidence for nutrient-specific foraging in vertebrate predators

被引:96
作者
Kohl, Kevin D. [1 ]
Coogan, Sean C. P. [2 ,3 ]
Raubenheimer, David [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Biol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Sydney, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Sch Biol Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[4] Univ Sydney, Fac Vet Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Sch Biol Sci, Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
carnivores; diet choice; predator-prey interactions; prey quality; prey selection; MACRONUTRIENT SELF-SELECTION; DIETARY-PROTEIN; POSTPRANDIAL INCREASES; NITROGENOUS EXCRETION; DIGESTIVE EFFICIENCY; NUTRITIONAL ECOLOGY; FOOD SELECTION; UREA SYNTHESIS; ENERGY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1002/bies.201400171
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A widespread perception is that carnivores are limited by the amount of prey that can be captured rather than their nutritional quality, and thus have no need to regulate macronutrient balance. Contrary to this view, recent laboratory studies show macronutrient-specific food selection by both invertebrate and vertebrate predators, and in some cases also associated performance benefits. The question thus arises of whether wild predators might likewise feed selectively according to the macronutrient content of prey. Here we review laboratory studies demonstrating the regulation of macronutrient intake by invertebrate and vertebrate predators, and address the question of whether this is likely to also occur in the wild. We conclude that it is highly likely that wild predators select prey or selectively feed on body parts according to their macronutrient composition, a possibility that could have significant implications for ecological and foraging theory, as well as applied wildlife conservation and management.
引用
收藏
页码:701 / 709
页数:9
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NATURE NUTR UNIFYING
[2]  
Baker Leslie A., 1993, Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, V47, P71
[3]   A COMPARISON OF DIGESTIVE EFFICIENCY IN BIRDS OF PREY [J].
BARTON, NWH ;
HOUSTON, DC .
IBIS, 1993, 135 (04) :363-371
[4]   HERBIVORE OPTIMAL FORAGING - A COMPARATIVE TEST OF 3 MODELS [J].
BELOVSKY, GE .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1984, 124 (01) :97-115
[5]   Wild berries: a good source of omega-3 [J].
Bere, E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2007, 61 (03) :431-433
[6]   Dietary nutrient profiles of wild wolves: insights for optimal dog nutrition? [J].
Bosch, Guido ;
Hagen-Plantinga, Esther A. ;
Hendriks, Wouter H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2015, 113 :S40-S54
[7]   OPTIMAL FORAGING, MARGINAL VALUE THEOREM [J].
CHARNOV, EL .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1976, 9 (02) :129-136
[8]   Selective consumption by predators of different body regions of prey: is rate of energy intake important? [J].
Chen, XL ;
Dickman, CR ;
Thompson, MB .
JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2004, 264 :189-196
[9]   MEASURING PREFERENCE IN SELECTIVE PREDATION [J].
CHESSON, J .
ECOLOGY, 1978, 59 (02) :211-215
[10]   Carnivorous Mammals: Nutrient Digestibility and Energy Evaluation [J].
Clauss, Marcus ;
Kleffner, Helen ;
Kienzle, Ellen .
ZOO BIOLOGY, 2010, 29 (06) :687-704