A psycho-oncological online intervention supporting partners of patients with cancer (PartnerCARE): Results from a randomized controlled feasibility trial

被引:10
作者
Bodschwinna, Daniela [1 ,2 ]
Lorenz, Inga [1 ]
Bauereiss, Natalie [3 ]
Guendel, Harald [1 ]
Baumeister, Harald [3 ]
Hoenig, Klaus [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Ulm, Dept Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapy, Albert Einstein Allee 23, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] Comprehens Canc Ctr Ulm CCCU, Ulm, Germany
[3] Ulm Univ, Inst Psychol & Educ, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Ulm, Germany
关键词
cancer; caregiver; caregiver burden; distress; e-health; online intervention; partner; psycho-oncology; quality of life; spouse; PSYCHOTHERAPY; DEPRESSION; CAREGIVERS; ATTITUDES; SPOUSES; IMPACT; PILOT;
D O I
10.1002/pon.5917
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Partners of cancer patients are the primary supporters and burdened at the same time. Support for partners is hitherto scarce and existing offers are rarely used. The PartnerCARE online intervention was specifically developed to address the caregiving partners' needs. This two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of PartnerCARE. Methods Sixty German-speaking partners of patients with various cancer entities were randomized into two conditions: intervention group (IG) with PartnerCARE (N = 30) or waitlist-control group (N = 30). Participants completed online questionnaires at baseline (T0), post-treatment (T1) and 4-months follow-up (T2). Feasibility and acceptability outcomes included dropout rates, use and acceptance of PartnerCARE, individual user/e-coach feedback as well as negative effects. Relevant efficacy outcomes were assessed to test for potential intervention effects. Results Recruitment success illustrates demand for and acceptability of PartnerCARE. Satisfaction with the intervention was high (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire adapted to Internet-based interventions, T1: M = 24.66, SD = 6.42) and 73.3% of participants completed the intervention. Study dropout rate was low (T1: 17%, T2: 29%). More positive than negative side effects of the intervention were identified, and negative ones were mainly related to "intrapersonal change". For efficacy outcomes we found effects over time, with strongest effects within the IG from T0 to T1 in psychological distress (d = 0.73, 95%-CI: [0.34; 1.12]) and anxiety (0.66, [0.26; 1.04]), but no group effects were significant at T1 and T2. Conclusions PartnerCARE is feasible, acceptable and potentially efficacious. Based on received feedback, PartnerCARE is currently undergoing further development and subsequently efficacy will be investigated in a RCT.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1242
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Care for the cancer caregiver: A systematic review [J].
Applebaum, Allison J. ;
Breitbart, William .
PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2013, 11 (03) :231-252
[2]  
Baumeister H., 2014, INTERNET INTERV, V1, P205, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.INVENT.2014.08.003
[3]  
Baumeister H, 2019, STUD NEUROSCI, P261, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-31620-4_17
[4]   A Systematic Review of Predictors of, and Reasons for, Adherence to Online Psychological Interventions [J].
Beatty, Lisa ;
Binnion, Claire .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (06) :776-794
[5]   PartnerCARE-a psycho-oncological online intervention for partners of patients with cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial [J].
Bodschwinna, Daniela ;
Lorenz, Inga ;
Bauereiss, Natalie ;
Guendel, Harald ;
Baumeister, Harald ;
Hoenig, Klaus .
BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10)
[6]   Reliability and Validity of Assessing User Satisfaction With Web-Based Health Interventions [J].
Boss, Leif ;
Lehr, Dirk ;
Reis, Dorota ;
Vis, Christiaan ;
Riper, Heleen ;
Berking, Matthias ;
Ebert, David Daniel .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (08)
[7]   MULTIPLE IMPUTATION FOR NONRESPONSE IN SURVEYS - RUBIN,DB [J].
CAMPION, WM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1989, 26 (04) :485-486
[8]   You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the brief COPE [J].
Carver, CS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1997, 4 (01) :92-100
[9]  
Cohen J. W, 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[10]  
Cordes A., 2009, KLIN DIAGN EVAL, V1, P16