Robotic Direct Inguinal Hernia Repair: To Plicate or Not to Plicate?

Background: Closure of the direct inguinal defect with plication in minimally invasive direct inguinal hernia repair may have potential benefits in terms of reducing postoperative surgical site events (SSEs) and recurrences. However, these advantages remain unclear, particularly in the robotic literature. This is the first comparative study to investigate the outcomes after robotic direct inguinal hernia repair (RDIHR) with defect plication. Materials and Methods: Among patients who underwent RIHR between 2013 and 2020, those who underwent RDIHR were selected. Patients were then stratified into 2 groups based on defect plication status, and univariate analyses were used to compare variables across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative timeframes. Results: A total of 225 RDIHRs were performed in 176 patients, where 74 were assigned to the Plication (+) group and 102 patients were assigned to the Plication (-) group. There was a significantly higher proportion of females in the Plication (-) group (10.8% vs. 1.4%, P=0.015), which accounts for the higher incidence of accompanying femoral hernias in this group. While most M1 hernia defects were left patent, most M2 and M3 hernias were plicated. Larger mesh sizes were used in the Plication (+) group (P<0.001). Three SSEs were observed in the Plication (-) group versus 2 SSEs in the Plication (+) group. No significant differences in postoperative outcomes were found between the 2 groups. Conclusions: Postoperative seroma incidence, pain scores, and recurrence rates were similar between the 2 study groups. Multicenter studies with larger populations and higher complication counts are needed to establish the role of defect plication in RDIHR.