Exploring the impacts of organisational structure, policy and practice on the health inequalities of marginalised communities: Illustrative cases from the UK healthcare system

被引:25
作者
Hui, Ada [1 ]
Latif, Asam [2 ]
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn [3 ]
Chen, Timothy [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Hlth Sci, Inst Mental Hlth, Jubilee Campus,Triumph Rd, Nottingham NG7 2TU, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Queens Med Ctr, Sch Hlth Sci, Nottingham NG7 2HA, England
[3] De Montfort Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Edith Murphy Bldg, Leicester LE1 9BH, Leics, England
[4] Univ Sydney, Sch Pharm, Pharm & Bank Bldg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Health inequalities; Marginalised communities; Care homes; Secure hospitals; Medication reviews; Health policy; PHARMACIES; SERVICE; WORKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.01.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores how organisational structure, policies and practices in healthcare can inadvertently disadvantage marginalised populations (e.g. individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds)and reinforce health inequalities. We draw upon three diverse UK healthcare settings (long term care institutions, high security hospitals and community pharmacies) to illustrate how systemic injustices negatively impact on access to care, treatment and health outcomes. The first case study considers the care of older people within nursing homes; specifically the disempowering effects of this service structure and impacts of choice reduction upon health and their access to health provision. The second case study explores the impact of security restrictions upon patients within high security hospitals, focusing particularly on the maintenance of relationships and support networks outside of the hospital. The third and final case study, draws upon a national community pharmacy medicine management service to illustrate ways in which policies and guidelines inadvertently obstruct patients' engagement with the service within a community setting. We draw upon these settings to highlight inequalities within different contexts and to illustrate the ways in which well intended services can inadvertently disadvantage marginalised communities in multiple ways. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 302
页数:5
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Working with vulnerable groups in social research: dilemmas by default and design [J].
Aldridge, Jo .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (01) :112-130
[2]  
[Anonymous], CAR ELD PEOPL MARK S
[3]   Noncancer Palliative Care: The Lost Pieces in an Acute Care Setting in Taiwan [J].
Hsu, Nin-Chieh ;
Lin, Yu-Feng ;
Shu, Chin-Chung ;
Yang, Ming-Chin ;
Ko, Wen-Je .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 30 (04) :334-338
[4]  
[Anonymous], ACCESSING HLTH CARE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PATHOLOGIES POWER HL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, INSIDE OUTSIDE IMPRO
[7]  
[Anonymous], REPORT REV SECURITY
[8]  
[Anonymous], POS PROACT RED NEED
[9]  
[Anonymous], HLTH IN MAN
[10]  
[Anonymous], GUID MED US REV SERV