Public participation and democratization: effects on the production and consumption of science and technology

被引:11
作者
Invernizzi, Noela [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana, Educ Sch, Curitiba, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Parana, Publ Policy Grad Program, Curitiba, Brazil
关键词
Public participation in S&T; consensus conferences; activism; alternative technologies; democracy; CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; UNDONE SCIENCE; ALTERNATIVE-TECHNOLOGY; ANTINUCLEAR MOVEMENTS; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL-MOVEMENTS; INNOVATION; FUKUSHIMA; BRAZIL; COMMERCIALIZATION;
D O I
10.1080/25729861.2020.1835225
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
In this article, I discuss the democratizing effects of public participation in science and technology (PPST). Various forms of PPST have emerged as reactions of civil society or as institutionalized responses of States to science-society conflicts. I distinguish PPST into three types, which I call institutionalized, activist and conflictive, and at the margins of mainstream science and technology. Based on a broad literature review and analysis of case studies, I examine the participating actors by identifying their position in the productive structure, their form of participation, the expert-lay relationship and the constitution of the discussion agenda. Then, I evaluate the democratizing effects of lay participation on the configuration of scientific agendas, on the direction of development of technological trajectories and on the imposition of norms or limits on the use of technology. I argue that this typology brings to focus some issues not highlighted in other existing public participation typologies. It identifies, from a political economy perspective, the position in the productive structure from which the actors participate and distinguishes the democratizing effects of public participation on the production and consumption of science and technology.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 253
页数:27
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Alvaredo F., 2018, World inequality report 2018
[2]  
Alzugaray Ribeiro Santiago, 2016, Cuad. antropol. soc., P95
[3]  
Andersen I., 1999, SCI PUBL POLICY, V26, P331, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154399781782301
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Agir dans un monde incertain : essai sur la democratie technique
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BIG AT TECHN CONV NA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Principles for the Oversight of Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials
[7]   Undone Science and Counter-Expertise: Fighting for Justice in an Argentine Community Contaminated by Pesticides [J].
Arancibia, Florencia ;
Motta, Renata .
SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2019, 28 (03) :277-302
[8]  
Barros Sandra Garrido de, 2017, Saúde debate, V41, P114, DOI 10.1590/0103-11042017s309
[9]  
Bensaude-Vincent Bernadette, 2012, Sci. stud., V10, P85
[10]   Democratic theory and citizen participation: democracy models in the evaluation of public participation in science and technology [J].
Biegelbauer, Peter ;
Hansen, Janus .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2011, 38 (08) :589-597