Association of guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment with clinical and economic outcomes among older women with metastatic breast cancer in the United States

被引:6
作者
Vyas, Ami [1 ]
Mantaian, Tyler [1 ]
Kamat, Shweta [1 ]
Kurian, Sobha [2 ]
Kogut, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rhode Isl, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, 7 Greenhouse Rd, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Sch Med, Morgantown, WV USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Guideline-concordant initial treatment; Metastatic breast cancer; Survival; Medicare expenditures; Predictors; RACIAL-DIFFERENCES; STAGE; SURVIVAL; COST; CARE; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgo.2021.05.012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We examined guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment among women with metastatic breast cancer, its predictors, and if guideline-concordant treatment was associated with mortality, healthcare utilization and Medicare expenditures. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results-Medicare linked database. Women aged 66-90 years diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer during 2010-2013 (N = 1282) were included. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines were used to determine the guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment following cancer diagnosis. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine significant predictors of guideline-concordant treatment. Gener-alized linear regressions were used to examine the association between guideline-concordant treatment and healthcare utilization and average monthly Medicare expenditures. Results: About 74% of the study cohort received guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment. Women who re-ceived guideline-concordant treatment were significantly more likely to be comparatively younger (p < 0.05), were married/partnered (p = 0.0038), had HER2 positive tumors, and had good performance status. Adjusted hazards ratios for all-cause (2.364, p < 0.0001) and breast-cancer specific mortality (2.179, p < 0.0001) were higher for women who did not receive guideline-concordant treatment. Rates of healthcare utilization were also higher for women not receiving guideline-concordant treatment. Average monthly Medicare expenditures were 100.4% higher (95% confidence interval: $77.3%-126.5%) for women who did not receive guideline-concordant treatment compared to those who received guideline-concordant treatment (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: One fourth of the study cohort did not receive guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment. Guideline-concordant initial treatment was associated with reduced mortality, and lower healthcare utilization and Medicare expenditures in women with metastatic breast cancer. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1092 / 1099
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Use and Costs of Disease Monitoring in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Accordino, Melissa K.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Vasan, Sowmya
    Neugut, Alfred I.
    Hillyer, Grace C.
    Hu, Jim C.
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (24) : 2820 - +
  • [2] Individual and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Healthcare Resources in Relation to Black-White Breast Cancer Survival Disparities
    Akinyemiju, Tomi F.
    Soliman, Amr S.
    Johnson, Norman J.
    Altekruse, Sean F.
    Welch, Kathy
    Banerjee, Mousumi
    Schwartz, Kendra
    Merajver, Sofia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 2013
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, NCCN GUID SUPP CAR
  • [4] Clinico-radiological monitoring strategies in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a real-world study
    Bonotto, Marta
    Basile, Debora
    Gerratana, Lorenzo
    Bartoletti, Michele
    Lisanti, Camilla
    Pelizzari, Giacomo
    Vitale, Maria Grazia
    Fanotto, Valentina
    Poletto, Elena
    Minisini, Alessandro Marco
    Russo, Stefania
    Andreetta, Claudia
    Mansutti, Mauro
    Fasola, Gianpiero
    Puglisi, Fabio
    [J]. FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 (27) : 2059 - 2073
  • [5] Understanding the Needs of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results of the Make Your Dialogue Count Survey
    Brufsky, Adam M.
    Ormerod, Catherine
    Dickson, Robyn Bell
    Citron, Marc L.
    [J]. BREAST JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [6] Busch E, 1996, CANCER, V78, P101, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<101::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-3
  • [8] Metastatic Breast Cancer, Version 1.2012 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
    Carlson, Robert W.
    Allred, D. Craig
    Anderson, Benjamin O.
    Burstein, Harold J.
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Farrar, William B.
    Forero, Andres
    Giordano, Sharon Hermes
    Goldstein, Lori J.
    Gradishar, William J.
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    Hudis, Clifford A.
    Isakoff, Steven Jay
    Ljung, Britt-Marie E.
    Mankoff, David A.
    Marcom, P. Kelly
    Mayer, Ingrid A.
    McCormick, Beryl
    Pierce, Lori J.
    Reed, Elizabeth C.
    Smith, Mary Lou
    Soliman, Hatem
    Somlo, George
    Theriault, Richard L.
    Ward, John H.
    Wolff, Antonio C.
    Zellars, Richard
    Kumar, Rashmi
    Shead, Dorothy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2012, 10 (07): : 821 - 829
  • [9] Carlson RW, 2018, NCCN CLIN PRACTICE G
  • [10] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383