Reading with the eyes and under the skin: Comprehending conflicting digital texts

被引:28
作者
Mason, Lucia [1 ]
Zaccoletti, Sonia [1 ]
Scrimin, Sara [1 ]
Tornatora, Maria Caterina [1 ]
Florit, Elena [1 ]
Goetz, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Dev Psychol & Socializat, Via Venezia 8, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Univ Vienna, Fac Psychol, Vienna, Austria
关键词
digital reading; eye movements; middle school students; multiple-text comprehension; skin conductance; ACADEMIC EMOTIONS; MODEL; INFORMATION; REACTIVITY; MOVEMENTS; AROUSAL; REAL; DOCUMENTS; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12399
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated the contribution of both physiological and behavioural process data to the comprehension of conflicting digital texts. We measured skin conductance level (SCL) as an index of arousal and the first-pass and look-back fixation times as indices of visual behaviour while reading. Forty-eight seventh graders read four webpages on genetically modified food, and their comprehension of the texts was measured using a short essay. Results showed that the type of webpage did not differentiate the process data. Statistical procedures for the comparison of a series of regression models revealed that SCL and first-pass fixation time negatively predicted multiple-text comprehension while also considering the control variables. The more the students were aroused while reading and the longer the processing time during the first encounter with the reading material, the poorer their comprehension of the conflicting texts. However, the interaction of prior knowledge and arousal positively predicted multiple-text comprehension. A slope analysis revealed that when participants had high prior knowledge and high arousal during reading, their postreading comprehension performance increased.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 101
页数:13
相关论文
共 63 条
[11]  
Boucsein W, 2012, ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVITY, SECOND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0
[12]   The Discrepancy-Induced Source Comprehension (D-ISC) Model: Basic Assumptions and Preliminary Evidence [J].
Braasch, Jason L. G. ;
Braten, Ivar .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 52 (03) :167-181
[13]   Source evaluation of domain experts and novices during Web search [J].
Brand-Gruwel, S. ;
Kammerer, Y. ;
van Meeuwen, L. ;
van Gog, T. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2017, 33 (03) :234-251
[14]   When law students read multiple documents about global warming: examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing [J].
Braten, Ivar ;
Stromso, Helge I. .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2010, 38 (06) :635-657
[15]   ESTABLISHING TRUSTWORTHINESS WHEN STUDENTS READ MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS CONTAINING CONFLICTING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE [J].
Braten, Ivar ;
Braasch, Jason L. G. ;
Stromso, Helge I. ;
Ferguson, Leila E. .
READING PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 36 (04) :315-349
[16]   Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays [J].
Braten, Ivar ;
Ferguson, Leila E. ;
Stromso, Helge I. ;
Anmarkrud, Oistein .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 84 (01) :58-85
[17]   Trust Matters: Examining the Role of Source Evaluation in Students' Construction of Meaning Within and Across Multiple Texts [J].
Braten, Ivar ;
Stromso, Helge I. ;
Britt, M. Anne .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2009, 44 (01) :6-28
[18]  
Christenson SL, 2012, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
[19]   Emotional Responses During Reading: Physiological Responses Predict Real-Time Reading Comprehension [J].
Daley, Samantha G. ;
Willett, John B. ;
Fischer, Kurt W. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 106 (01) :132-143
[20]  
Dayton C., 2003, J MODERN APPL STAT M, V2, P281, DOI DOI 10.22237/JMASM/1067644920