Experiments and Surveys on Political Elites

被引:69
作者
Kertzer, Joshua D. [1 ]
Renshon, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Govt, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Polit Sci, Madison, WI USA
关键词
political elites; elite experiments; elite surveys; NETWORK ANALYSIS; FIELD EXPERIMENT; DECISION-MAKING; PUBLIC-OPINION; SINKING COSTS; PSYCHOLOGY; DECEPTION; TESTOSTERONE; CONSEQUENCES; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013649
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
One of the major developments in political science in the past decade has been the rise of experiments and surveys on political elites. Yet, the increase in the number of elite studies has outpaced our collective understanding of best practices and how we know a good elite experiment when we see one. In this article, we discuss some of the challenges in the study of political elites-from who counts as an elite to how to best utilize elite experiments in the context of broader research designs. We also offer recommendations on questions of access, recruitment, and representativeness, as well as designs that researchers can use to study "eliteness" without access to elites.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 550
页数:22
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [1] Elites are people, too: The effects of threat sensitivity on policymakers' spending priorities
    Arceneaux, Kevin
    Dunaway, Johanna
    Soroka, Stuart
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):
  • [2] Cultivating Clients: Reputation, Responsiveness, and Ethnic Indifference in India's Slums
    Auerbach, Adam Michael
    Thachil, Tariq
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 64 (03) : 471 - 487
  • [3] Axelrod Robert, 1976, Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Map of Political Elites
  • [4] The Role of Evidence in Politics: Motivated Reasoning and Persuasion among Politicians
    Baekgaard, Martin
    Christensen, Julian
    Dahlmann, Casper Mondrup
    Mathiasen, Asbjorn
    Petersen, Niels Bjorn Grund
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 49 (03) : 1117 - 1140
  • [5] Who's Elite and How the Answer Matters to Politics
    Bahador, Babak
    Entman, Robert
    Knuepfer, Curd
    [J]. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 2019, 36 (01) : 195 - 202
  • [6] The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments
    Bansak, Kirk
    Hainmueller, Jens
    Hopkins, Daniel J.
    Yamamoto, Teppei
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 26 (01) : 112 - 119
  • [7] Biased Policy Professionals
    Banuri, Sheheryar
    Dercon, Stefan
    Gauri, Varun
    [J]. WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 33 (02) : 310 - 327
  • [8] Due Deference: Cosmopolitan Social Identity and the Psychology of Legal Obligation in International Politics
    Bayram, A. Burcu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2017, 71 : S137 - S163
  • [9] Bellemare C, 2014, DISC PAP 8583
  • [10] Blair G, 2019, AM POLIT SCI REV, V113, P838, DOI [10.1017/s0003055419000194, 10.1017/S0003055419000194]