Putting the image back in imagination (Ontology)

被引:22
作者
Kind, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Claremont Mckenna Coll, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2653590
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Despite their intuitive appeal and a long philosophical history, imagery-based accounts of the imagination have fallen into disfavor in contemporary discussions. The philosophical pressure to reject such accounts seems to derive from two distinct sources. First, the fact that mental images have proved difficult to accommodate within a scientific conception of mind has led to numerous attempts to explain away their existence, and this in turn has led to attempts to explain the phenomenon of imagining without reference to such ontologically dubious entities as mental images. Second, even those philosophers who accept mental images in their ontology have worried about what seems to be fairly obvious examples of imaginings that occur without imagery. In this paper, I aim to relieve both these points of philosophical pressure and, in the process, develop a new imagery-based account of the imagination: the imagery model.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 109
页数:25
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1952, MIND, DOI DOI 10.1093/MIND/LXI.244.528
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1974, ART IMAGINATION
[3]  
ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M
[4]  
Block N., 1981, IMAGERY
[5]  
BLOCK N, 1995, PHILOS ISSUES PERCEP
[6]  
Cottingham John, 1984, Philosophical Writings of Descartes
[7]  
Dennett D. C., 1988, CONSCIOUSNESS CONT S, P42, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198522379.003.0003
[8]  
Dennett DanielClement., 1986, CONTENT CONSCIOUSNES, V2nd
[9]  
Hobbes Thomas., LEVIATHAN
[10]  
ISHIGURU H, 1966, BRIT ANAL PHILOS, P171