Reduction of Scatter Radiation During Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Trial Using a Lead-free Radiation Shield

被引:82
作者
Politi, Luigi [1 ]
Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe [1 ]
Nocetti, Luca [2 ]
Costi, Tiziana [2 ]
Monopoli, Daniel [1 ]
Rossi, Rosario [1 ]
Sgura, Fabio [1 ]
Modena, Maria Grazia [1 ]
Sangiorgi, Giuseppe M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Policlin Hosp, Intervent Cardiol Unit, I-41124 Modena, Italy
[2] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Policlin Hosp, Dept Hlth Phys, I-41124 Modena, Italy
关键词
coronary angiography; radiations; protection; FEMORAL APPROACH; PROTECTION; RADIOLOGY; EXPOSURE; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1002/ccd.22947
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Occupational radiation exposure is a growing problem due to the increasing number and complexity of interventional procedures performed. Radial artery access has reduced the number of complications at the price of longer procedure duration. Radpad (R) scatter protection is a sterile, disposable bismuth-barium radiation shield drape that should be able to decrease the dose of operator radiation during diagnostic and interventional procedures. Such radiation shield has never been tested in a randomized study in humans. Methods: Sixty consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography by radial approach were randomized 1: 1 to Radpad use versus no radiation shield protection. The sterile shield was placed around the area of right radial artery sheath insertion and extended medially to the patient trunk. All diagnostic procedures were performed by the same operator to reduce variability in radiation absorption. Radiation exposure was measured blindly using thermoluminescence dosimeters positioned at the operator's chest, left eye, left wrist, and thyroid. Results: Despite similar fluoroscopy time (3.52 +/- 2.71 min vs. 3.46 +/- 2.77 min, P = 0.898) and total examination dose (50.5 +/- 30.7 vs. 45.8 +/- 18.0 Gycm(2), P = 0.231), the mean total radiation exposure to the operator was significantly lower when Radpad was utilized (282.8 +/- 32.55 mu Sv vs. 367.8 +/- 105.4 mu Sv, P < 0.0001) corresponding to a 23% total reduction. Moreover, mean radiation exposure was lower with Radpad utilization at all body locations ranging from 13 to 34% reduction. Conclusions: This first-in-men randomized trial demonstrates that Radpad significantly reduces occupational radiation exposure during coronary angiography performed through right radial artery access. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 102
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures - Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Agostoni, P
    Biondi-Zoccai, GGL
    De Benedictis, ML
    Rigattieri, S
    Turri, M
    Anselmi, M
    Vassanelli, C
    Zardini, P
    Louvard, Y
    Hamon, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) : 349 - 356
  • [2] Centers for Disease Control National Center for Health Statistics, 2010, HEALTH CAR AM TRENDS
  • [3] Occupational hazards for interventional cardiologists
    Dehmer, Gregory J.
    Goldstein, James
    Naito, Neil
    Miller, Donald L.
    Haines, David
    Kleinerman, Ruth
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2006, 68 (06) : 974 - 976
  • [4] Heavy metal pad shielding during fluoroscopic interventions
    Dromi, Sergio
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Oberoi, Jay
    Neeman, Ziv
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (07) : 1201 - 1206
  • [5] Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
    Ector, Joris
    Dragusin, Octavian
    Adriaenssens, Bert
    Huybrechts, Wim
    Willems, Rik
    Ector, Hugo
    Heidbuechel, Hein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 50 (03) : 234 - 242
  • [6] ESTIMATION OF RADIATION RISKS - BEIR-V AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR MEDICINE
    HENDEE, WR
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (05): : 620 - 624
  • [7] Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures
    Kim, Kwang Pyo
    Miller, Donald L.
    Balter, Stephen
    Kleinerman, Ruth A.
    Linet, Martha S.
    Kwon, Deukwoo
    Simon, Steven L.
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2008, 94 (03): : 211 - 227
  • [8] Using a sterile disposable protective surgical drape for reduction of radiation exposure to interventionalists
    King, JN
    Champlin, AM
    Kelsey, CA
    Tripp, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 178 (01) : 153 - 157
  • [9] Occupational Health Hazards in the Interventional Laboratory: Time for a Safer Environment
    Klein, Lloyd W.
    Miller, Donald L.
    Balter, Stephen
    Laskey, Warren
    Haines, David
    Norbash, Alexander
    Mauro, Matthew A.
    Goldstein, James A.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2009, 73 (03) : 432 - 438
  • [10] Louvard Y, 2001, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V52, P181, DOI 10.1002/1522-726X(200102)52:2<181::AID-CCD1044>3.0.CO