Candesartan in migraine prevention: results from a retrospective real-world study

被引:12
作者
Messina, Roberta [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Lastarria Perez, Carlo P. [5 ,6 ]
Filippi, Massimo [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Goadsby, Peter J. [5 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Inst Expt Neurol, Div Neurosci, Neuroimaging Res Unit, Via Olgettina 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] Neurol Unit, Milan, Italy
[3] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Neurophysiol Unit, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[5] Kings Coll London, NIHR Wellcome Trust Kings Clin Res Facil, London, England
[6] Clin Valle Sur, AUNA, Dept Neurol, Arequipa, Peru
关键词
Migraine; Candesartan; Prevention; Treatment response; Challenging migraine patients; BLIND;
D O I
10.1007/s00415-020-09989-9
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Randomized studies have reported a positive effect of candesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in migraine prevention. The aim of our study was to explore patient subjective efficacy of candesartan in a real-world sample of migraine patients and try to identify predictors of candesartan response. We audited the clinical records of 253 patients who attended the King's College Hospital, London, from February 2015 to December 2017, looking specifically at their response to candesartan. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of headache benefit. Odds ratios (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) 95% were calculated. Eighty-one patients (chronic migraine,n = 68) were included in the final analysis. Thirty-eight patients reported a positive response to candesartan, while 43 patients did not have a meaningful therapeutic effect. The median dose of candesartan was 8 mg and the median treatment period was 6 months. In a univariate logistic regression model, the presence of daily headache was associated with reduced odds of headache benefit (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.96,p = 0.04). In multivariate logistic regression model, younger age (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98,p = 0.006) and longer disease duration (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.12,p = 0.03) were associated with a good response to candesartan, while the presence of daily headache was associated with reduced odds of headache benefit (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.71,p = 0.01). Having failed up to nine preventives in patients did not predict a treatment failure with candesartan as well. Candesartan yields clinical benefits in difficult-to-treat migraine patients, irrespective of previous failed preventives.
引用
收藏
页码:3243 / 3247
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) [J].
Bes, Andre ;
Kunkel, Robert ;
Lance, James W. ;
Nappi, Giuseppe ;
Pfaffenrath, Volker ;
Rose, Frank Clifford ;
Schoenberg, Bruce S. ;
Soyka, Dieter ;
Tfelt-Hansen, Peer ;
Welch, K. Michael A. ;
Wilkinson, Marica ;
Olesen, Jes ;
Bousser, Marie-Germaine ;
Diener, Hans-Christoph ;
Dodick, David ;
First, Michael ;
Goadsby, Peter J. ;
Goebel, Hartmut ;
Lainez, Miguel J. A. ;
Lance, James W. ;
Lipton, Richard B. ;
Nappi, Giuseppe ;
Sakai, Fumihiko ;
Schoenen, Jean ;
Silberstein, Stephen D. ;
Steiner, Timothy J. ;
Olesen, Jes ;
Bendtsen, Lars ;
Dodick, David ;
Ducros, Anne ;
Evers, Stefan ;
First, Michael ;
Goadsby, Peter J. ;
Hershey, Andrew ;
Katsarava, Zaza ;
Levin, Morris ;
Pascual, Julio ;
Russell, Michael B. ;
Schwedt, Todd ;
Steiner, Timothy J. ;
Tassorelli, Cristina ;
Terwindt, Gisela M. ;
Vincent, Maurice ;
Wang, Shuu-Jiun ;
Olesen, J. ;
Evers, S. ;
Charles, A. ;
Hershey, A. ;
Lipton, R. ;
First, M. .
CEPHALALGIA, 2013, 33 (09) :629-808
[2]   The American Headache Society Position Statement On Integrating New Migraine Treatments Into Clinical Practice [J].
Digre, Kathleen B. .
HEADACHE, 2019, 59 (01) :1-18
[3]   CGRP ligand and receptor monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention: Evidence review and clinical implications [J].
Dodick, David W. .
CEPHALALGIA, 2019, 39 (03) :445-458
[4]   OnabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: predictors of response. A prospective multicentre descriptive study [J].
Dominguez, C. ;
Pozo-Rosich, P. ;
Torres-Ferrus, M. ;
Hernandez-Beltran, N. ;
Jurado-Cobo, C. ;
Gonzalez-Oria, C. ;
Santos, S. ;
Monzon, M. J. ;
Latorre, G. ;
Alvaro, L. C. ;
Gago, A. ;
Gallego, M. ;
Medrano, V. ;
Huerta, M. ;
Garcia-Alhama, J. ;
Belvis, R. ;
Leira, Y. ;
Leira, R. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2018, 25 (02) :411-416
[5]   Duration of migraine is a predictor for response to botulinum toxin type A [J].
Eross, EJ ;
Gladstone, JP ;
Lewis, S ;
Rogers, R ;
Dodick, DW .
HEADACHE, 2005, 45 (04) :308-314
[6]   Fremanezumab versus placebo for migraine prevention in patients with documented failure to up to four migraine preventive medication classes (FOCUS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trial [J].
Ferrari, Michel D. ;
Diener, Hans Christoph ;
Ning, Xiaoping ;
Galic, Maja ;
Cohen, Joshua M. ;
Yang, Ronghua ;
Mueller, Matthias ;
Ahn, Andrew H. ;
Schwartz, Yael Carmeli ;
Grozinski-Wolff, Melissa ;
Janka, Lindsay ;
Ashina, Messoud .
LANCET, 2019, 394 (10203) :1030-1040
[7]   Migraine [J].
Langland, James T. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (17) :1698-1698
[8]  
Messina R, 2018, EUR J NEUROL, V25, P112
[9]  
Mulleners WM, 2019, CEPHALALGIA, V39, P366
[10]   Efficacy of candesartan in the treatment of migraine in hypertensive patients [J].
Owada, K .
HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2004, 27 (06) :441-446