Identification of patients with diabetic macular edema from claims data - A validation study

被引:46
作者
Bearelly, Srilaxmi [1 ,2 ]
Mruthyunjaya, Prithvi [1 ,2 ]
Tzeng, Janice P.
Suner, Ivan J. [1 ,2 ]
Shea, Alisa M.
Lee, Jeffrey T. [4 ]
Kowalski, Jonathan W. [4 ]
Curtis, Lesley H. [3 ]
Schulman, Kevin A. [3 ]
Lee, Paul P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Ctr Eye, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[4] Allergan Pharmaceut Inc, Global Hlth Outcomes Res, Irvine, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archopht.126.7.986
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the validity of an algorithm for identifying patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes in administrative billing data from a convenience sample of physician offices. Methods: A convenience sample of 12 general ophthalmologists and 10 retina specialists applied prespecified algorithms based on ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes to the billing claims of their practices and selected the associated medical records. Four ophthalmologists abstracted data from the medical records, which were then compared with the coded diagnoses. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and the K statistic for the DME algorithm (a combination of codes 250.xx and 362.53), treating medical record documentation of DME as the standard criterion. Results: The DME algorithm had a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.96 for identifying DME. Excellent agreement was noted between the algorithm and the medical records (kappa = 0.84). The algorithm performed less well in identifying patients with a diagnosis of clinically significant DME (sensitivity, 0.86; specificity, 0.84; kappa = 0.64). Conclusions: The results of this pilot study suggest that patients with DME can be identified accurately in claims data using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Application of this algorithm could improve investigations of disease prevalence and disease burden and provide an efficient means of assessing care and interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:986 / 989
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Accuracy of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying cardiovascular and stroke risk factors [J].
Birman-Deych, E ;
Waterman, AD ;
Yan, Y ;
Nilasena, DS ;
Radford, MJ ;
Gage, BF .
MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (05) :480-485
[2]   Use of insurance claims databases to evaluate the outcomes of ophthalmic surgery [J].
Coleman, AL ;
Morgenstern, H .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 42 (03) :271-278
[3]   THE ACCURACY OF MEDICARES HOSPITAL CLAIMS DATA - PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE, BUT PROBLEMS REMAIN [J].
FISHER, ES ;
WHALEY, FS ;
KRUSHAT, WM ;
MALENKA, DJ ;
FLEMING, C ;
BARON, JA ;
HSIA, DC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 82 (02) :243-248
[4]   ACCURACY OF DIAGNOSTIC CODING FOR MEDICARE PATIENTS UNDER THE PROSPECTIVE-PAYMENT SYSTEM [J].
HSIA, DC ;
KRUSHAT, WM ;
FAGAN, AB ;
TEBBUTT, JA ;
KUSSEROW, RP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (06) :352-355
[5]   ACCURACY OF CODING IN MEDICARE PART-B CLAIMS - CATARACT AS A CASE-STUDY [J].
JAVITT, JC ;
MCBEAN, AM ;
SASTRY, SS ;
DIPAOLO, F .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 111 (05) :605-607
[6]  
KLEIN R, 1995, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V102, P7
[7]   Impact of the population at risk of diabetes on projections of diabetes burden in the United States: an epidemic on the way [J].
Mainous, A. G., III ;
Baker, R. ;
Koopman, R. J. ;
Saxena, S. ;
Diaz, V. A. ;
Everett, C. J. ;
Majeed, A. .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2007, 50 (05) :934-940
[8]   Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data [J].
Quan, HD ;
Sundararajan, V ;
Halfon, P ;
Fong, A ;
Burnand, B ;
Luthi, JC ;
Saunders, LD ;
Beck, CA ;
Feasby, TE ;
Ghali, WA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (11) :1130-1139
[9]   Estimates of incidence rates with longitudinal claims data [J].
Sloan, FA ;
Brown, DS ;
Carlisle, ES ;
Ostermann, J ;
Lee, PP .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 121 (10) :1462-1468