Training of radiology specialists in local staging of primary rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective intervention study exploring the impact of various educational elements on the interpretive performance

被引：4

作者：

Bregendahl, Sidse ^{[1
]}

Bondeven, Peter ^{[2
]}

Gronborg, Therese Koops ^{[3
]}

Brown, Gina ^{[4
]}

Laurberg, Soren ^{[5
]}

Pedersen, Bodil Ginnerup ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Aarhus, Denmark

[2] Reg Hosp Randers, Dept Surg, Randers, Denmark

[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Biostat, Aarhus, Denmark

[4] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England

[5] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Aarhus, Denmark

来源：

BMJ OPEN QUALITY | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期

关键词：

Continuing education; continuing professional development; Healthcare quality improvement; Health professions education; Quality improvement; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; ACCURACY; PROGRAM; IMPROVE; READERS; COUNTY; AUDIT;

D O I：

10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001716

中图分类号：

R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background MRI interpretation and accurate radiological staging are crucial to the important treatment decisions and a consequent successful patient outcome in rectal cancer. Aims To investigate the effect of intensive training on rectal cancer MRI staging performance of radiologists and the impact of different course elements on learning outcomes. Methods In this prospective intervention study, 17 radiology specialists and 1 radiology registrar participated in a training programme including a 6-hour imaging workshop, a 3-hour session of individual feedback and independent MRI readings of primary rectal cancer cases. Their rectal MRI interpretive performance was evaluated through repeated readings of 30 training cases before and after each course element and a time interval with no educational intervention. A proforma template for MRI staging of primary rectal cancer was used and the results were compared with a reference standard of an expert panel. Participants repeatedly reported on confidence scores and self-assessed learning outcome. Outcomes were analysed using mixed-effects models. Results At baseline the quality of rectal MRI assessment varied significantly, with a higher interpretive performance among participants with shorter radiological experience (10.2 years vs 19.9 years, p=0.02). The ability to perform correct treatment allocation improved from 72% to 82% (adjusted OR=2.36, 95% CI 1.64 to 3.39). The improvement was largely driven by the participants with lower performance at baseline and by prevention of overstaging. Individual feedback had a significant impact on the improved interpretive performance (adjusted OR=1.82, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.63), whereas no significant change was seen after workshop or case readings only. Confidence scores increased significantly during training. Conclusions Targeted and individualised training improves the rectal cancer MRI interpretive performance essential to successful patient treatment, especially among radiology specialists with lower performance at baseline.

引用

页数：9