Risk assessment and risk stratification for perioperative complications and mitigation: Where should the focus be? How are we doing?

被引:7
|
作者
Adeleke, Ibukun [1 ]
Chae, Christina [1 ]
Okocha, Obianuju [1 ]
Sweitzer, BobbieJean [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Feinberg 5-704,251 East Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
risk assessment; optimization; perioperative complications; functional capacity; biomarkers; anemia; adverse outcomes; POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; 2014 ACC/AHA GUIDELINE; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; CARDIAC RISK; PREOPERATIVE ANEMIA; CARDIOVASCULAR EVALUATION; POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; HEART-FAILURE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Various risk stratification tools are used to predict patients' risk of adverse outcomes. Most of these tools are based on type of surgery and patient comorbidities. Accuracy of risk prediction is improved when additional factors such as functional capacity are included. However, these tools are limited because data are obtained from specific patient populations, are simplified to aid ease of use, and do not account for improved treatment modalities that occur over time. Risk estimation allows for shared decision-making among the perioperative care team and the patient, for perioperative planning, and for opportunity for risk mitigation. Technological advancement in data collection will likely improve existing risk assessment and allow development of new options. Future research should focus on establishing and standardizing perioperative outcomes that include meaningful patient-centric considerations such as quality of life. We review available stratification tools and important risk assessment biomarkers that address the most common causes of adverse outcomes. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 529
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] How should environmental exposure risk be assessed? A comparison of four methods for exposure assessment of air pollutions
    Zou, Bin
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2010, 166 (1-4) : 159 - 167
  • [32] How should environmental exposure risk be assessed? A comparison of four methods for exposure assessment of air pollutions
    Bin Zou
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2010, 166 : 159 - 167
  • [33] Forensic risk assessment interviews with youth: how do we elicit the most reliable and complete information?
    Leach, Chelsea L.
    Powell, Martine B.
    PSYCHIATRY PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW, 2020, 27 (03) : 428 - 440
  • [34] Contemporary Risk Assessment Tools: Should We Use Them for Sexually Abusive Children Ages 4 to 12 Years?
    L. C. Miccio-Fonseca
    Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 2020, 13 : 141 - 151
  • [35] Assessment of deaths attributable to air pollution:: Should we use risk estimates based on time series or on cohort studies?
    Künzli, N
    Medina, S
    Kaiser, R
    Quénel, P
    Horak, F
    Studnicka, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 153 (11) : 1050 - 1055
  • [36] The role of biomarkers in the assessment of prostate cancer risk prior to prostate biopsy: Which markers matter and how should they be used?
    Marianne Schmid
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Markus Graefen
    Margit Fisch
    Felix K. Chun
    Jens Hansen
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 871 - 880
  • [37] The role of biomarkers in the assessment of prostate cancer risk prior to prostate biopsy: Which markers matter and how should they be used?
    Schmid, Marianne
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Graefen, Markus
    Fisch, Margit
    Chun, Felix K.
    Hansen, Jens
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (04) : 871 - 880
  • [38] Treatment Strategies and Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome: How Do We Identify Patients Who Would Benefit From Early Invasive Treatment?
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2010, 63 (08): : 888 - 889
  • [39] Cardiovascular risk stratification in hemodialysis patients in the era of highly sensitive troponins: should we choose between hs-troponin I and hs-troponin T?
    Bargnoux, Anne-Sophie
    Kuster, Nils
    Patrier, Laure
    Dupuy, Anne-Marie
    Tachon, Gaelle
    Maurice, Francois
    Badaoui, Bouchra
    Chalabi, Lotfi
    Badiou, Stephanie
    Deleuze, Sebastien
    Leray-Moragues, Helene
    Morena, Marion
    Canaud, Bernard
    Cristol, Jean-Paul
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 54 (04) : 673 - 682
  • [40] How short should short-term risk assessment be? Determining the optimum interval for START reassessment in a secure mental health service
    Dickens, G. L.
    O'Shea, L. E.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2015, 22 (06) : 397 - 406