Risk assessment and risk stratification for perioperative complications and mitigation: Where should the focus be? How are we doing?

被引:7
|
作者
Adeleke, Ibukun [1 ]
Chae, Christina [1 ]
Okocha, Obianuju [1 ]
Sweitzer, BobbieJean [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Feinberg 5-704,251 East Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
risk assessment; optimization; perioperative complications; functional capacity; biomarkers; anemia; adverse outcomes; POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; 2014 ACC/AHA GUIDELINE; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; CARDIAC RISK; PREOPERATIVE ANEMIA; CARDIOVASCULAR EVALUATION; POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; HEART-FAILURE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Various risk stratification tools are used to predict patients' risk of adverse outcomes. Most of these tools are based on type of surgery and patient comorbidities. Accuracy of risk prediction is improved when additional factors such as functional capacity are included. However, these tools are limited because data are obtained from specific patient populations, are simplified to aid ease of use, and do not account for improved treatment modalities that occur over time. Risk estimation allows for shared decision-making among the perioperative care team and the patient, for perioperative planning, and for opportunity for risk mitigation. Technological advancement in data collection will likely improve existing risk assessment and allow development of new options. Future research should focus on establishing and standardizing perioperative outcomes that include meaningful patient-centric considerations such as quality of life. We review available stratification tools and important risk assessment biomarkers that address the most common causes of adverse outcomes. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 529
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Perioperative risk assessment - focus on functional capacity
    Hanley, Ciara
    Wijeysundera, Duminda N.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 34 (03) : 309 - 316
  • [2] Perioperative Assessment and Risk Stratification of the Obese Patient
    Schofield, Deborah L.
    Morton, Patricia G.
    Brokos, Carol
    Gruel, Renee
    Johannes, Sarah
    McBride, Nancy
    Moses, Gloria
    BARIATRIC NURSING AND SURGICAL PATIENT CARE, 2011, 6 (04): : 201 - 206
  • [3] Quantitative risk assessment since the Red Book: Where have we come and where should we be going?
    Crump, KS
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2003, 9 (05): : 1105 - 1112
  • [4] Sex Offender Risk Assessment: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
    L. Maaike Helmus
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2018, 20
  • [5] Sex Offender Risk Assessment: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
    Helmus, L. Maaike
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2018, 20 (06)
  • [6] Sex differences in stroke risk have changed: should we reconsider risk stratification?
    Nohr, Anne Krogh
    Nielsen, Peter Bronnum
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE, 2024, 43
  • [7] Stroke and Bleeding Risk Assessment in Atrial Fibrillation: Where Are We Now?
    Kuo, Ling
    Chan, Yi-Hsin
    Liao, Jo-Nan
    Chen, Shih-Ann
    Chao, Tze-Fan
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2021, 51 (08) : 668 - 680
  • [8] The next generation of prognostic series: Where we can improve on risk stratification?
    Shaw, Leslee J.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (05) : 1145 - 1147
  • [9] Preoperative Risk Stratification Reduces the Incidence of Perioperative Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Radcliff, Kristen E.
    Orozco, Fabio R.
    Quinones, Daniel
    Rhoades, Daniel
    Sidhu, Gursukhman S.
    Ong, Alvin C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (08) : 77 - 80
  • [10] Where are we in risk assessment of food allergens? The regulatory view
    Madsen, C
    ALLERGY, 2001, 56 : 91 - 93