Selecting and tailoring implementation interventions: a concept mapping approach

被引:32
作者
Kwok, Elaine Yuen Ling [1 ]
Moodie, Sheila T. F. [2 ,3 ]
Cunningham, Barbara Jane [1 ]
Cardy, Janis E. Oram [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, Elborn Coll, 1201 Western Rd, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, RM 2262K,1201 Western Rd, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Natl Ctr Audiol, Elborn Coll, RM 2262K,1201 Western Rd, London, ON N6G 1H1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Implementation intervention; Speech-language pathologist; Concept mapping; Practice-based research; Outcome measurement; Population outcomes; health outcomes; stakeholder engagement; Implementation planning; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; HEALTH-CARE; CONSENSUS; COMMUNICATION; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-05270-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundTo improve the uptake of research into practice, knowledge translation frameworks recommend tailoring implementation strategies to address practice barriers. This study reports our experience pairing the Theoretical Domains Framework with information from multiple stakeholder groups to co-develop practice-informed strategies for improving the implementation of an evidence-based outcome measurement tool across a large community health system for preschoolers with communication impairments.MethodsConcept mapping was used to identify strategies for improving implementation of the Focus on the Outcomes of Communication Under Six (FOCUS) in Ontario Canada's Preschool Speech and Language Program. This work was done in five stages. First, we interviewed 37 speech-language pathologists (clinicians) who identified 90 unique strategies to resolve practice barriers to FOCUS implementation. Second, clinicians (n=34), policy-makers (n=3), and members of the FOCUS research team (n=6) sorted and rated the strategies by importance and feasibility. Third, stakeholders' sorting data were analyzed to generate a two-dimensional concept map. Based on the rating data from stakeholders, we prioritized a list of strategies that were rated as highly important and highly feasible, and summarized the practice barriers addressed by each of the prioritized strategies. Fourth, we validated these findings with stakeholders via an online survey. Fifth, the mechanisms of action of the prioritized list of strategies were considered based on available evidence from the Theoretical Domains Framework and associated behavior change literature.ResultsStakeholders categorized the 90 unique implementation strategies into a six-cluster concept map. Based on stakeholders' ratings, a list of 14 implementation strategies were prioritized. These implementation strategies were reported to resolve barriers within the environmental context and resources and beliefs about consequences domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. All but one of the prioritized strategies have a demonstrated link in resolving existing barriers according to the behavioral change literature.ConclusionsOur study contributes to a growing literature that demonstrates the process of tailoring implementation strategies to specific barriers. Practical drawbacks and benefits of using concept mapping as a way to engage stakeholders in implementation research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CONC SYST GLOB MAX
[2]   A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems [J].
Atkins, Lou ;
Francis, Jill ;
Islam, Rafat ;
O'Connor, Denise ;
Patey, Andrea ;
Ivers, Noah ;
Foy, Robbie ;
Duncan, Eilidh M. ;
Colquhoun, Heather ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ;
Lawton, Rebecca ;
Michie, Susan .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
[3]   Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes [J].
Baker, Richard ;
Camosso-Stefinovic, Janette ;
Gillies, Clare ;
Shaw, Elizabeth J. ;
Cheater, Francine ;
Flottorp, Signe ;
Robertson, Noelle .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (03)
[4]   Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions: Fine in theory, but evidence of effectiveness in practice is needed [J].
Bhattacharyya, Onil ;
Reeves, Scott ;
Garfinkel, Susan ;
Zwarenstein, Merrick .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2006, 1 (1)
[5]   Tailoring quality improvement interventions to identified barriers: a multiple case analysis [J].
Bosch, Marije ;
van der Weijden, Trudy ;
Wensing, Michel ;
Grol, Richard .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 13 (02) :161-168
[6]   From lists of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to structured hierarchies: Comparison of two methods of developing a hierarchy of BCTs [J].
Cane, James ;
Richardson, Michelle ;
Johnston, Marie ;
Ladha, Ruhina ;
Michie, Susan .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 20 (01) :130-150
[7]   Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research [J].
Cane, James ;
O'Connor, Denise ;
Michie, Susan .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
[8]   Links Between Behavior Change Techniques and Mechanisms of Action: An Expert Consensus Study [J].
Connell, Lauren E. ;
Carey, Rachel N. ;
de Bruin, Marijn ;
Rothman, Alexander J. ;
Johnston, Marie ;
Kelly, Michael P. ;
Michie, Susan .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 (08) :708-720
[9]   Factors Contributing to Preschoolers' Communicative Participation Outcomes: Findings From a Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada [J].
Cunningham, Barbara Jane ;
Hanna, Steven E. ;
Rosenbaum, Peter ;
Thomas-Stonell, Nancy ;
Oddson, Bruce .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2018, 27 (02) :737-750
[10]   A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations [J].
Davies, Philippa ;
Walker, Anne E. ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5