Improving intensity-modulated radiation therapy using the anatomic beam orientation optimization algorithm

被引:19
作者
Potrebko, Peter S. [1 ,2 ]
McCurdy, Boyd M. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Butler, James B. [3 ,4 ]
El-Gubtan, Adel S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CancerCare Manitoba, Div Med Phys, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
[2] Univ Manitoba, Dept Phys & Astron, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[3] Univ Manitoba, Dept Radiol, Winnipeg, MB R3A 1R9, Canada
[4] CancerCare Manitoba, Dept Radiat Oncol, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
关键词
intensity-modulated radiotherapy; beam orientation optimization;
D O I
10.1118/1.2905026
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A novel, anatomic beam orientation optimization (A-BOO) algorithm is proposed to significantly improve conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The A-BOO algorithm vectorially analyses polygonal surface mesh data of contoured patient anatomy. Five optimal (5-opt) deliverable beam orientations are selected based on (1) tangential orientation bisecting the target and adjacent organ's-at-risk (OARs) to produce precipitous dose gradients between them and (2) parallel incidence with polygon features of the target volume to facilitate conformal coverage. The 5-opt plans were compared to standard five, seven, and nine equiangular-spaced beam plans (5-equi, 7-equi, 9-equi) for: (1) gastric, (2) Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) P-0126 prostate, and (3) RTOG H-0022 oropharyngeal (stage-III, IV) cancer patients. In the gastric case, the noncoplanar 5-opt plan reduced the right kidney V 20 Gy by 32.2%, 23.2%, and 20.6% compared to plans with five, seven, and nine equiangular-spaced beams. In the prostate case, the coplanar 5-opt plan produced similar rectal sparing as the 7-equi and 9-equi plans with a reduction of the V 75, V 70, V 65, and V 60 Gy of 2.4%, 5.3%, 7.0%, and 9.5% compared to the 5-equi plan. In the stage-III and IV oropharyngeal cases, the noncoplanar 5-opt plan substantially reduced the V 30 Gy and mean dose to the contralateral parotid compared to plans with five, seven, and nine equiangular-spaced beams: (stage-III) 7.1%, 5.2%, 6.8%, and 5.1, 3.5, 3.7 Gy and (stage-IV) 10.2%, 10.2%, 9.8% and 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 Gy. The geometry-based A-BOO algorithm has been demonstrated to be robust for application to a variety of IMRT treatment sites. Beam orientations producing significant improvements in OAR sparing over conventional IMRT can be automatically produced in minutes compared to hours with existing dose-based beam orientation optimization methods. (c) 2008 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:2170 / 2179
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simultaneous optimization of beam orientations, wedge filters and field weights for inverse planning with anatomy-based MLC fields
    Beaulieu, F
    Beaulieu, L
    Tremblay, D
    Roy, R
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1546 - 1557
  • [2] Elimination of importance factors for clinically accurate selection of beam orientations, beam weights and wedge angles in conformal radiation therapy
    Bedford, JL
    Webb, S
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (07) : 1788 - 1804
  • [3] OPTIMIZATION OF BEAM ORIENTATIONS IN RADIATION-THERAPY - SOME THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    BORTFELD, T
    SCHLEGEL, W
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (02) : 291 - 304
  • [4] A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: Initial results
    Chao, KSC
    Deasy, JO
    Markman, J
    Haynie, J
    Perez, CA
    Purdy, JA
    Low, DA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (04): : 907 - 916
  • [5] Selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy using single-beam indices and integer programming
    D'Souza, WD
    Meyer, RR
    Shi, LY
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (15) : 3465 - 3481
  • [6] Beam orientation selection for intensity-modulated radiation therapy based on target equivalent uniform dose maximization
    Das, S
    Cullip, T
    Tracton, G
    Chang, S
    Marks, L
    Anscher, M
    Rosenman, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 55 (01): : 215 - 224
  • [7] Algorithm and performance of a clinical IMRT beam-angle optimization system
    Djajaputra, D
    Wu, QW
    Wu, Y
    Mohan, R
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (19) : 3191 - 3212
  • [8] Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer
    Eisbruch, A
    Kim, HM
    Terrell, JE
    Marsh, LH
    Dawson, LA
    Ship, JA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (03): : 695 - 704
  • [9] EZZELL GA, 1996, MED PHYS, V23, P239
  • [10] An algorithm for systematic selection of beam directions for IMRT
    Gaede, S
    Wong, E
    Rasmussen, H
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (02) : 376 - 388