Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

被引:50
作者
Boeck, Stefan [1 ]
Wilkowski, Ralf [3 ]
Bruns, Christiane J. [2 ]
Issels, Rolf D. [1 ,4 ]
Schulz, Christoph [1 ]
Moosmann, Nicolas [1 ]
Laessig, Dorit [1 ]
Haas, Michael [1 ]
Golf, Alexander [5 ]
Heinemann, Volker [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med 3, Klinikum Grosshadern, DE-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Dept Surg, Klinikum Grosshadern, DE-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Klin Bad Trissl, Oberaudorf, Germany
[4] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Neuherberg, Germany
[5] Klinikum Stuttgart, Dept Med 1, Buergerhosp, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
capecitabine; chemotherapy; gemcitabine; pancreatic cancer;
D O I
10.1159/000127413
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To date, no standard regimen for salvage chemotherapy after gemcitabine (Gem) failure has been defined for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Oral capecitabine (Cap) has shown promising activity in first-line chemotherapy trials in PC patients. Methods: Within a prospective single-center study, Cap was offered to patients who had already received at least 1 previous treatment regimen containing full-dose Gem (as a single agent, as part of a combination chemotherapy regimen or sequentially within a chemoradiotherapy protocol). Cap was administered orally at a dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest. Study endpoints were objective tumor response rate by imaging criteria (according to RECIST), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) tumor marker response, time to progression, overall survival and toxicity. Results: A median of 3 treatment cycles (range 1-36) was given to 39 patients. After a median follow-up of 6.6 months, 27 patients were evaluable for response: no complete or partial responses were observed, but 15 patients (39%) had stable disease. A CA19-9 reduction of >20% after 2 cycles of Cap was documented in 6 patients (15%). Median time to progression was 2.3 months (range 0.5-45.1) and median overall survival (since start of Cap treatment) was 7.6 months (range 0.7-45.1). Predominant grade 2 and 3 toxicities (per patient analysis) were hand-foot syndrome 28% (13% grade 3); anemia 23%; leg edema 15%; diarrhea 13%; nausea/vomiting 10%, and leukocytopenia 10%. Conclusion: Single-agent Cap is a safe treatment option for Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC. Further evaluation of Cap in controlled clinical trials of Gem-pretreated patients with advanced PC is recommended. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 227
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] High risk of venous thrombosis in patients with pancreatic cancer: A cohort study of 202 patients
    Blom, JW
    Osanto, S
    Rosendaal, FR
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (03) : 410 - 414
  • [2] Second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed after gemcitabine failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer:: a multicenter phase II trial
    Boeck, S.
    Weigang-Koehler, K.
    Fuchs, M.
    Kettner, E.
    Quietzsch, D.
    Trojan, J.
    Stoetzer, O.
    Zeuzem, S.
    Lordick, F.
    Koehne, C. -H.
    Kroening, H.
    Steinmetz, T.
    Depenbrock, H.
    Heinemann, V.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (04) : 745 - 751
  • [3] Importance of performance status for treatment outcome in advanced pancreatic cancer
    Boeck, Stefan
    Hinke, Axel
    Wilkowski, Ralf
    Heinemann, Volker
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 13 (02) : 224 - 227
  • [4] Prognostic and therapeutic significance of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 as tumor marker in patients with pancreatic cancer
    Boeck, Stefan
    Stieber, Petra
    Holdenrieder, Stefan
    Wilkowski, Ralf
    Heinemann, Volker
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2006, 70 (04) : 255 - 264
  • [5] Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial
    Burris, HA
    Moore, MJ
    Andersen, J
    Green, MR
    Rothenberg, ML
    Madiano, MR
    Cripps, MC
    Portenoy, RK
    Storniolo, AM
    Tarassoff, P
    Nelson, R
    Dorr, FA
    Stephens, CD
    VanHoff, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) : 2403 - 2413
  • [6] Combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced pre-treated pancreatic cancer
    Cantore, M
    Rabbi, C
    Fiorentini, G
    Oliani, C
    Zamagni, D
    Iacono, C
    Mambrini, A
    Del Freo, A
    Manni, A
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2004, 67 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [7] Phase II study of oral capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Cartwright, TH
    Cohn, A
    Varkey, JA
    Chen, YM
    Szatrowski, TP
    Cox, JV
    Schulz, JJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (01) : 160 - 164
  • [8] Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II study
    Demols, A
    Peeters, M
    Polus, M
    Marechal, R
    Gay, F
    Monsaert, E
    Hendlisz, A
    Van Laethem, JL
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 94 (04) : 481 - 485
  • [9] The gemcitabine, docetaxel, and capecitabine (GTX) regimen for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis
    Fine, Robert L.
    Fogelman, David R.
    Schreibman, Stephen M.
    Desai, Manisha
    Sherman, William
    Strauss, James
    Guba, Susan
    Andrade, Riolan
    Chabot, John
    [J]. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 61 (01) : 167 - 175
  • [10] Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A comparative analysis of randomized trials
    Heinemann, V
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2002, 29 (06) : 9 - 16