A randomized controlled trial of a cognitive-behavioral family intervention for pediatric recurrent abdominal pain

被引:143
作者
Robins, PM
Smith, SM
Glutting, JJ
Bishop, CT
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Alfred I duPont Hosp Children, Wilmington, DE USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[4] La Salle Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
关键词
recurrent abdominal pain; cognitive-behavioral intervention; children; adolescents; clinical trial; cost-benefit;
D O I
10.1093/jpepsy/jsi063
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate whether the combination of standard medical care (SMC) and short-term cognitive-behavioral family treatment (CBT) in the treatment of recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) was more effective than SMC alone. Methods Children recently diagnosed with RAP via physician examination were randomized into SMC (n = 29) and SMC plus CBT (n = 40) groups. Outcome measures included multiple dimensions of child and parent reported child pain, somatization, and functional disability, and school absences and physician contacts. Results Children and parents participating in the combined SMC + CBT intervention reported significantly less child and parent reported child abdominal pain than children in the SMC intervention immediately following the intervention and up to 1 year following study entry, as well as significantly fewer school absences. Significant differences in functional disability and somatization were not revealed. Conclusions These results, in combination with previous studies, add support to the effectiveness of CBT intervention in reducing the sensory aspects of RAP. Results are discussed with respect to the cost-benefit of integrated medical and short-term psychological services.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 408
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CLIN PSYCHOL-UK, V28, P3, DOI DOI 10.1037/E554972011-003
[3]  
Apley J., 1975, CHILD ABDOMINAL PAIN, V2nd
[4]   Psychosocial aspects of assessment and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in adults and recurrent abdominal pain in children [J].
Blanchard, EB ;
Scharff, L .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 70 (03) :725-738
[5]   Somatization in pediatric primary care: Association with psychopathology, functional impairment, and use of services [J].
Campo, JV ;
Jansen-McWilliams, L ;
Comer, DM ;
Kelleher, KJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 38 (09) :1093-1101
[6]  
CHAMBERS CT, 2003, CONTEXT PEDIAT PAIN
[7]   The impact of psychological interventions on medical cost offset: A meta-analytic review [J].
Chiles, JA ;
Lambert, MJ ;
Hatch, AL .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 1999, 6 (02) :204-220
[8]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[9]   THE NUMBER NEEDED TO TREAT - A CLINICALLY USEFUL MEASURE OF TREATMENT EFFECT [J].
COOK, RJ ;
SACKETT, DL .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6977) :452-454
[10]  
FAUL F, 1992, GPOWER PRIOR POST HO