A Systematic Review of Instruments for the Assessment of Insomnia in Adults

被引:21
作者
Ali, Raja Mahamade [1 ]
Zolezzi, Monica [1 ]
Awaisu, Ahmed [1 ]
机构
[1] Qatar Univ, Coll Pharm, QU Hlth, POB 2713, Doha 2713, Qatar
来源
NATURE AND SCIENCE OF SLEEP | 2020年 / 12卷
关键词
insomnia; sleep hygiene; sleep quality; questionnaires; psychometric properties; SLEEP QUALITY INDEX; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DYSFUNCTIONAL BELIEFS; SEVERITY INDEX; HYGIENE PRACTICES; SCREENING TOOL; SYMPTOM SCALE; VALIDITY; POPULATION;
D O I
10.2147/NSS.S250918
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Self-reported sleep instruments remain the most practical methods for the assessment of insomnia in clinical practice. This systematic review aims to identify, describe and summarize the psychometric properties of questionnaires available for the assessment of insomnia in the adult population. In addition, the review also aimed to identify sleep instruments available in the Arabic language. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, ProQuest Central, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. The quality assessment of the instruments was conducted using two established international criteria. Results: One hundred and seven articles were selected for inclusion, from which 31 instruments were identified and categorized based on the constructs they assess as: (1) screening for insomnia (n=14); (2) measuring the consequences of insomnia (n=8); (3) assessing the cognitive aspects of insomnia (n= 5); and (4) assessing sleep hygiene (n= 4). The review of the psychometric properties showed that the Insomnia Severity Index and the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire were the most extensively evaluated instrument. Criterion validity and reliability measures were the most commonly reported properties. Only four of the identified instruments were available in Arabic. Discussion: Overall, the findings of this study indicate ample availability of sleep instruments. However, psychometric testing for several of the available sleep instruments remains incomplete, particularly responsiveness and interpretability. Our findings suggest that future studies should focus on reporting more psychometric measures to ensure the trustworthiness of these instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 409
页数:33
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
  • [2] Ahmed Anwar E, 2014, Qatar Med J, V2014, P130, DOI 10.5339/qmj.2014.20
  • [3] SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE SLEEPINESS IN THE ACTIVE INDIVIDUAL
    AKERSTEDT, T
    GILLBERG, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1990, 52 (1-2) : 29 - 37
  • [4] [Anonymous], J CLIN SLEEP MED
  • [5] [Anonymous], SLEEP HYPNOSIS
  • [6] Test-retest reliability and validity of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index in primary insomnia
    Backhaus, J
    Junghanns, K
    Broocks, A
    Riemann, D
    Hohagen, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2002, 53 (03) : 737 - 740
  • [7] Insomnia as a predictor of depression: A meta-analytic evaluation of longitudinal epidemiological studies
    Baglioni, Chiara
    Battagliese, Gemma
    Feige, Bernd
    Spiegelhalder, Kai
    Nissen, Christoph
    Voderholzer, Ulrich
    Lombardo, Caterina
    Riemann, Dieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2011, 135 (1-3) : 10 - 19
  • [8] Reliability and validity in a nutshell
    Bannigan, Katrina
    Watson, Roger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2009, 18 (23) : 3237 - 3243
  • [9] Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research
    Bastien, Celyne H.
    Vallieres, Annie
    Morin, Charles M.
    [J]. SLEEP MEDICINE, 2001, 2 (04) : 297 - 307
  • [10] Development and psychometric evaluation of a new patient-reported outcome instrument measuring the functional impact of insomnia
    Bell, Christopher
    McLeod, Lori D.
    Nelson, Lauren M.
    Fehnel, Sheri E.
    Zografos, Laurie J.
    Bowers, Brian
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (09) : 1457 - 1468