Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed sequences

被引:30
作者
Chang, Daniel H. -E. [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Jeon-Hor [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lin, Muqing [1 ,2 ]
Bahri, Shadfar [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Hon J. [1 ,2 ]
Mehta, Rita S. [5 ]
Nie, Ke [1 ,2 ]
Hsiang, David J. B. [6 ]
Nalcioglu, Orhan [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Su, Min-Ying [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Tu & Yuen Ctr Funct Oncoimaging, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiol Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Med, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[6] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Surg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[7] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Cognomechatron Engn, Pusan 609735, South Korea
关键词
quantitative breast density; 3D breast parenchymal morphology; pulse sequence comparison; fat suppression; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; PARENCHYMAL PATTERNS; CANCER RISK; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1118/1.3646756
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the difference of MR percent breast density measured from fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed imaging sequences. Methods: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without fat suppression was acquired from 38 subjects. Breasts were divided into subgroups of different morphological patterns ("central" and "intermingled" types). Breast volume, fibroglandular tissue volume, and percent density were measured. The results were compared using nonparametric statistical tests and regarded as significant at p < 0.05. Results: Breast volume, fibroglandular volume, and percent density between fat-suppressed and nonfat-suppressed sequences were highly correlated. Breast volumes measured on these two sequences were almost identical. Fibroglandular tissue volume and percent density, however, had small (< 5%) yet significant differences between the two sequences-they were both higher on the fat-suppressed sequence. Intraobserver variability was within 4% for both sequences and different morphological types. The fibroglandular tissue volume measured on downsampled images showed a small (< 5%) yet significant difference. Conclusions: The measurement of breast density made on MRI acquired using fat-suppressed and nonfat-suppressed T1W images was about 5% difference, only slightly higher than the intraobserver variability of 3%-4%. When the density data from multiple centers were to be combined, evaluating the degree of difference is needed to take this difference into account. (C) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3646756]
引用
收藏
页码:5961 / 5968
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Dite, GS ;
Stone, J ;
Gunasekara, A ;
English, DR ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Giles, GG ;
Tritchler, D ;
Chiarelli, A ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Hopper, JL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (12) :886-894
[2]   QUANTITATIVE CLASSIFICATION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - RESULTS FROM THE CANADIAN NATIONAL BREAST SCREENING STUDY [J].
BOYD, NF ;
BYNG, JW ;
JONG, RA ;
FISHELL, EK ;
LITTLE, LE ;
MILLER, AB ;
LOCKWOOD, GA ;
TRITCHLER, DL ;
YAFFE, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (09) :670-675
[3]   Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer [J].
Boyd, Norman F. ;
Guo, Helen ;
Martin, Lisa J. ;
Sun, Limei ;
Stone, Jennifer ;
Fishell, Eve ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Hislop, Greg ;
Chiarelli, Anna ;
Minkin, Salomon ;
Yaffe, Martin J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (03) :227-236
[4]   Reduction of breast density following tamoxifen treatment evaluated by 3-D MRI: preliminary study [J].
Chen, Jeon-Hor ;
Chang, Yeun-Chung ;
Chang, Daniel ;
Wang, Yi-Ting ;
Nie, Ke ;
Chang, Ruey-Feng ;
Nalcioglu, Orhan ;
Huang, Chiun-Sheng ;
Su, Min-Ying .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 29 (01) :91-98
[5]   Decrease in Breast Density in the Contralateral Normal Breast of Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: MR Imaging Evaluation [J].
Chen, Jeon-Hor ;
Nie, Ke ;
Bahri, Shadfar ;
Hsu, Chieh-Chih ;
Hsu, Fei-Ting ;
Shih, Han-Ni ;
Lin, Muqing ;
Nalcioglu, Orhan ;
Su, Min-Ying .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 255 (01) :44-52
[6]   Fat-Free MRI Based on Magnetization Exchange [J].
Chen, Jin-Hong ;
Le, H. Carl ;
Koutcher, Jason A. ;
Singer, Samuel .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2010, 63 (03) :713-718
[7]   Effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer [J].
Eng-Wong, Jennifer ;
Orzano-Birgani, Jennifer ;
Chow, Catherine K. ;
Venzon, David ;
Yao, Jianhua ;
Galbo, Claudia E. ;
Zujewski, Jo Anne ;
Prindiville, Sheila .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (07) :1696-1701
[8]   Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: Relationship with breast cancer risk [J].
Harvey, JA ;
Bovbjerg, VE .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (01) :29-41
[9]   Breast MR imaging artifacts: How to recognize and fix them [J].
Harvey, Jennifer A. ;
Hendrick, R. Edward ;
Coll, Jennifer M. ;
Nicholson, Brandi T. ;
Burkholder, Brian T. ;
Cohen, Michael A. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 :S131-S145
[10]   A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Khazen, Michael ;
Warren, Ruth M. L. ;
Boggis, Caroline R. M. ;
Bryant, Emilie C. ;
Reed, Sadie ;
Warsi, Iqbal ;
Pointon, Linda J. ;
Kwan-Lim, Gek E. ;
Thompson, Deborah ;
Eeles, Ros ;
Easton, Doug ;
Evans, D. Gareth ;
Leach, Martin O. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (09) :2268-2274