TIME-DOMAIN IMPLEMENTATION OF HIGHER-ORDER NON-REFLECTING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR TURBOMACHINERY APPLICATIONS

被引:0
|
作者
Henninger, Stefan [1 ]
Jeschke, Peter [1 ]
Ashcroft, Graham [2 ]
Kuegeler, Edmund [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Jet Prop & Turbomachinery, D-52062 Aachen, Germany
[2] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Prop Technol, D-51147 Cologne, Germany
来源
ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2015, VOL 2B | 2015年
关键词
LINEAR HYPERBOLIC SYSTEMS; EULER EQUATIONS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The present paper demonstrates the time-domain implementation of arbitrary-order non-reflecting boundary conditions for a 3d non-linear time-accurate REINS solver for turbomachinery applications. The conditions are based on the 2d circumferential mode decomposition of the linearized Euler equations. The exact linearized conditions are non-local since they involve space-time Fourier/Laplace transforms. Time-local conditions of arbitrary order are obtained by approximation of the inverse Laplace transform Bessel function convolution kernel by sums of exponential functions. Likewise, this corresponds to a rational function approximation of the exact non-reflecting boundary kernel in the frequency-domain. The boundary conditions are validated against two numerical test cases. The first test case mimics Tyler-Sofrin modes present in turbomachinery applications by prescribing 2d acoustic modes in a uniform flow. The second test case is concerned with the potential contamination of blade flutter analyses by spurious reflections on artificial boundaries. For the benchmark problem Standard Configuration 10, blade flutter with non-zero inter-blade phase angle, acoustic resonance generates spinning waves susceptible to reflection. Contrasting the results of non-reflecting boundary conditions of varying order of accuracy shows that low order conditions can fail for challenging cases, which emphasizes the need for an accurate non-reflecting boundary treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Generalized non-reflecting radiation boundary conditions: numerical implementation
    Tran, T. M.
    Brunner, S.
    Alberti, S.
    Braunmueller, F.
    Genoud, J.
    Hogge, J. -Ph.
    Tran, M. Q.
    2014 39TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFRARED, MILLIMETER, AND TERAHERTZ WAVES (IRMMW-THZ), 2014,
  • [2] ADAPTATION OF GILES NON-LOCAL NON-REFLECTING BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR A CELL-CENTERED SOLVER FOR TURBOMACHINERY APPLICATIONS
    Robens, Sebastian
    Jeschke, Peter
    Frey, Christian
    Kuegeler, Edmund
    Bosco, Arianna
    Breuer, Thomas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2013, VOL 6B, 2013,
  • [3] Extrapolation non-reflecting boundary conditions
    Liao, ZP
    WAVE MOTION, 1996, 24 (02) : 117 - 138
  • [4] Non-reflecting boundary conditions for waveguides
    Bendali, A
    Guillaume, P
    MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION, 1999, 68 (225) : 123 - 144
  • [5] HIGHER-ORDER ABSORBING BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS FOR THE FINITE-DIFFERENCE TIME-DOMAIN METHOD
    TIRKAS, PA
    BALANIS, CA
    RENAUT, RA
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1992, 40 (10) : 1215 - 1222
  • [6] High-order local non-reflecting boundary conditions: a review
    Givoli, D
    WAVE MOTION, 2004, 39 (04) : 319 - 326
  • [7] High-order non-reflecting boundary conditions for dispersive waves
    Givoli, D
    Neta, B
    WAVE MOTION, 2003, 37 (03) : 257 - 271
  • [8] Permeable and non-reflecting boundary conditions in SPH
    Lastiwka, Martin
    Basa, Mihai
    Quinlan, Nathan J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2009, 61 (07) : 709 - 724
  • [9] HIGHER-ORDER FORMULATION OF ABSORBING BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS FOR FINITE-DIFFERENCE TIME-DOMAIN METHOD
    WANG, PY
    KOZAKI, S
    OHKI, M
    YABE, T
    ELECTRONICS LETTERS, 1993, 29 (23) : 2018 - 2020
  • [10] EXACT NON-REFLECTING BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS
    KELLER, JB
    GIVOLI, D
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1989, 82 (01) : 172 - 192