Empirical structure of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder traits in Arabic-speaking Algerian culture

被引:17
作者
Bach, Bo [1 ]
El Abiddine, Fares Zine [2 ]
机构
[1] Slagelse Psychiat Hosp, Ctr Personal Disorder Res, Psychiat Res Unit, Faelledvej 6,Bygning 3,4 Sal, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark
[2] Univ Djillali Liabes Sidi Bel Abbes, Dept Psychol, Sidi Bel Abbes, Algeria
关键词
Personality disorder; DSM-5; ICD-11; WHO; PID-5; personality trait domains; structural validity; Algeria; cross-cultural validity; DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION; INVENTORY; DOMAINS; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/00207411.2020.1732624
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Mental health professionals using the DSM-5 and ICD-11 are allowed to describe personality disorders in terms of trait domain qualifiers (i.e., Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Antagonism/Dissociality, Disinhibition, Anankastia, and Psychoticism). The present study sought to evaluate the structural validity of both DSM-5 and ICD-11 traits in Algerian culture. Algerian university students (N = 638; 67.9% women) were administered the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form (PID-5-BF). The expected empirical domain organization of DSM-5 and ICD-11 traits was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by a post hoc confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). As anticipated, the five-factor pattern overall corresponded to the five DSM-5 trait domains, including a domain of Psychoticism. Likewise, the four-factor structure overall aligned with the ICD-11 trait domain qualifiers, including a single factor denoting Disinhibition versus low Anankastia. However, a few items showed less adequate functioning across the two models, possibly due to cultural differences. Findings provided some support for the structural validity of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder trait models in Algerian culture, and the trait patterns overall resembled international findings on DSM-5 and ICD-11 trait domains. Future research warrants replication in clinical populations, and association with various health outcomes should be explored.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 200
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Al-Attiyah A.A., 2017, International Journal of Culture and Mental Health, V10, P197, DOI [DOI 10.1080/17542863.2017.1290125, 10.1080/17542863.2017, DOI 10.1080/17542863.2017]
[2]   Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology [J].
Anderson, Jaime L. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Salekin, Randall T. .
ASSESSMENT, 2018, 25 (05) :596-607
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PERSONALITY INVENTOR
[4]   Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits: initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems [J].
Bach, B. ;
Sellbom, M. ;
Kongerslev, M. ;
Simonsen, E. ;
Krueger, R. F. ;
Mulder, R. .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 136 (01) :108-117
[5]  
Bach B., 2020, INT ASSESSMENT DSM 5, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/qcwsb, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/QCWSB]
[6]   Structure of Clinician-Reported ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Qualifiers [J].
Bach, Bo ;
Christensen, Sune ;
Kongerslev, Mickey T. ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Simonsen, Erik .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2020, 32 (01) :50-59
[7]   Schema therapy conceptualization of personality functioning and traits in ICD-11 and DSM-5 [J].
Bach, Bo ;
Bernstein, David P. .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 32 (01) :38-49
[8]   ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground [J].
Bach, Bo ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Skjernov, Mathias ;
Simonsen, Erik .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 52 (05) :425-434
[9]   Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Clinical Versus Nonclinical Individuals: Generalizability of Psychometric Features [J].
Bach, Bo ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Simonsen, Erik .
ASSESSMENT, 2018, 25 (07) :815-825
[10]   The Alternative DSM-5 Personality Disorder Traits Criterion: A Comparative Examination of Three Self-Report Forms in a Danish Population [J].
Bach, Bo ;
Maples-Keller, Jessica L. ;
Bo, Sune ;
Simonsen, Erik .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 7 (02) :124-135