Cohesion as a constraint on object persistence in infancy

被引:57
作者
Cheries, Erik W. [1 ]
Mitroff, Stephen R. [2 ]
Wynn, Karen [1 ]
Scholl, Brian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Psychol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00687.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
A critical challenge for visual perception is to represent objects as the same persisting individuals over time and motion. Across several areas of cognitive science, researchers have identified cohesion as among the most important theoretical principles of object persistence: An object must maintain a single bounded contour over time. Drawing inspiration from recent work in adult visual cognition, the present study tested the power of cohesion as a constraint as it operates early in development. In particular, we tested whether the most minimal cohesion violation - a single object splitting into two - would destroy infants' ability to represent a quantity of objects over occlusion. In a forced-choice crawling paradigm, 10- and 12-month-old infants witnessed crackers being sequentially placed into containers, and typically crawled toward the container with the greater cracker quantity. When one of the crackers was visibly split in half, however, infants failed to represent the relative quantities, despite controls for the overall quantities and the motions involved. This result helps to characterize the fidelity and specificity of cohesion as a fundamental principle of object persistence, suggesting that even the simplest possible cohesion violation can dramatically impair infants' object representations and influence their overt behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   OBJECT PERMANENCE IN 5-MONTH-OLD INFANTS [J].
BAILLARGEON, R ;
SPELKE, ES ;
WASSERMAN, S .
COGNITION, 1985, 20 (03) :191-208
[3]  
BAILLARGEON R, 1991, CHILD DEV, V62, P1227, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01602.x
[4]  
Bloom P., 2002, CHILDREN LEARN MEANI
[5]   Interpreting infant looking: The event set x event set design [J].
Bogartz, RS ;
Shinskey, JL ;
Speaker, CJ .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 33 (03) :408-422
[6]   Infants' knowledge of objects: beyond object files and object tracking [J].
Carey, S ;
Xu, F .
COGNITION, 2001, 80 (1-2) :179-213
[7]   Science and core knowledge [J].
Carey, S ;
Spelke, E .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1996, 63 (04) :515-533
[8]  
Carey S, 2006, J VISION, V6, p611a
[9]   Infants' tracking of objects and collections [J].
Chiang, WC ;
Wynn, K .
COGNITION, 2000, 77 (03) :169-195
[10]   The representations underlying infants' choice of more: Object files versus analog magnitudes [J].
Feigenson, L ;
Carey, S ;
Hauser, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (02) :150-156