Energy analysis and efficiency assessment of reverse osmosis desalination process

被引:85
作者
Liu, Cui [1 ]
Rainwater, Ken [1 ]
Song, Lianfa [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
关键词
Reverse osmosis; Water desalination; Energy efficiency; Configuration energy; Thermodynamic restriction; DRIVEN MEMBRANE PROCESSES; WATER DESALINATION; THERMODYNAMIC RESTRICTION; SEAWATER DESALINATION; BRACKISH-WATER; OPTIMIZATION; CONSUMPTION; PRESSURE; COST; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.074
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
A new concept of ideal RO process is introduced in this study for a more appropriate assessment of energy efficiency of water desalination, in which all the extra energy above the thermodynamic minimum is spent to maintain the required permeate flux. A pressure-recovery diagram was developed as a graphical method for better analyses and presentations of energy consumption in cross flow RO. It was demonstrated that the total energy input to a cross flow RO was much higher than the thermodynamic minimal energy for water desalination. Aside from the energy that remained in the retentate stream, a substantial amount of additional energy was needed in cross flow RO to maintain an economically meaningful nonzero permeate flux and overcome the elevated osmotic pressure due to salt accumulation along the membrane channel (configuration associated energy). The configuration associated energy became dominant at high recoveries and set the ultimate limit on the energy requirement of cross flow RO, which could not be reduced by further improvement in membrane permeability. Finally, the energy efficiency of cross flow RO was compared to an ideal RO process in which the configuration energy was completely eliminated. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 358
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Energy consumption and membrane replacement cost for seawater RO desalination plants [J].
Avlonitis, SA ;
Kouroumbas, K ;
Vlachakis, N .
DESALINATION, 2003, 157 (1-3) :151-158
[2]   Reducing energy consumption in seawater desalination [J].
Busch, M ;
Mickols, WE .
DESALINATION, 2004, 165 (1-3) :299-312
[3]   State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination [J].
Fritzmann, C. ;
Loewenberg, J. ;
Wintgens, T. ;
Melin, T. .
DESALINATION, 2007, 216 (1-3) :1-76
[4]   Optimized brackish water desalination plants with minimum impact on the environment [J].
Glueckstern, P ;
Priel, M .
DESALINATION, 1997, 108 (1-3) :19-26
[5]   Investigation of seawater reverse osmosis fouling and its relationship to pretreatment type [J].
Kumar, M ;
Adham, SS ;
Pearce, WR .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (06) :2037-2044
[6]   Minimization of Energy in Reverse Osmosis Water Desalination Using Constrained Nonlinear Optimization [J].
Li, Mingheng .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2010, 49 (04) :1822-1831
[7]   Two-Step Optimization of Pressure and Recovery of Reverse Osmosis Desalination Process [J].
Liang, Shuang ;
Liu, Cui ;
Song, Lianfa .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (09) :3272-3277
[8]  
Mulder M., 1997, BASIC PRINCIPLES MEM
[9]  
*NRC COMM ADV DES, 2008, DES NAT PERSP
[10]   Reverse osmosis desalting of inland brackish water of high gypsum scaling propensity: Kinetics and mitigation of membrane mineral scaling [J].
Rahardianto, Anditya ;
Mccool, Brian C. ;
Cohen, Yoram .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 42 (12) :4292-4297