How Does the Language Control of L1 and L2 Writers Develop Over Time in First-Year Composition?

被引:3
作者
Eckstein, Grant [1 ]
Chang, Ruei-Han [2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Linguist, 4064 JFSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
FYC; L1; L2; complexity; accuracy; fluency; plurilingual; SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY-MEASURES; WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; WRITING PEDAGOGY; GENERATION; 1.5; ESL; 2ND-LANGUAGE; STUDENTS; PATTERNS; FEATURES; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1177/07410883221099474
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Most U.S. colleges and universities expect students to improve their writing ability by taking first-year composition (FYC) courses. In such courses, non-native English (L2) writers with diverse language backgrounds study alongside their native English (L1) speaking peers. However, it is not clear how different these populations are in terms of their language development over time, leaving questions unanswered about whether L2 writers develop more or less than L1 writers in an FYC curriculum. To investigate, we compared 75 L1 and L2 students' written accuracy, fluency, and lexical and syntactic complexity over the semester of an FYC course. Data showed that L2 students had significantly higher rates of language error and less fluent and lexically complex writing compared to L1 writers. Moreover, L2 student writing became less grammatically accurate over 14 weeks despite showing greater fluency and syntactic complexity. These results suggest a need for plurilingual pedagogies in FYC that embrace diversity and inclusion while also providing L2 writers with instruction on socially powerful and dominant linguistic forms.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 629
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Impact of early English language teaching on L1 and L2 development in children in Dutch schools [J].
Goorhuis-Brouwer, Sieneke ;
de Bot, Kees .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BILINGUALISM, 2010, 14 (03) :289-302
[32]   Self-Repair in Elicited Narrative Production in Speakers of Russian as the First (L1), Second (L2), and Heritage (HL) Language [J].
Bogdanova-Beglarian, Natalia ;
Zaides, Kristina ;
Verkhovtceva, Tatiana ;
Beradze, Marianna ;
Meir, Natalia .
LANGUAGES, 2022, 7 (03)
[33]   Stance construction via that-clauses in telecommunications research articles: a comparison of L1 and L2 expert writers [J].
Wu, Juanjuan ;
Pan, Fan .
TEXT & TALK, 2024, 44 (03) :387-410
[34]   Comparing Language Use in the Writing of Developmental Generation 1.5, L1, and L2 Tertiary Students [J].
Doolan, Stephen M. .
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 2014, 31 (02) :215-247
[35]   The Relationship between L1 and L2 Reading Comprehension and Language and Reading Proficiency at the Tertiary Level [J].
Mikulec, Alenka ;
Vuic, Bozica .
JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND EDUCATION, 2019, 5 (04) :54-65
[36]   At the same time: Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 university student argumentative writing [J].
Bychkovska, Tetyana ;
Lee, Joseph J. .
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2017, 30 :38-52
[37]   English Language Learners' Nonword Repetition Performance: The Influence of Age, L2 Vocabulary Size, Length of L2 Exposure, and L1 Phonology [J].
Duncan, Tamara Sorenson ;
Paradis, Johanne .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2016, 59 (01) :39-48
[38]   A Multi-Component Writing Intervention With and Without Peer-Tutoring on Text Production of Diverse Struggling L1 and L2 Writers [J].
Barwasser, Anne ;
Asaro-Saddler, Kristie ;
Saddler, Bruce ;
Nobel, Kerstin ;
Gruenke, Matthias .
PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2025,
[39]   Language-independent talker-specificity in first-language and second-language speech production by bilingual talkers: L1 speaking rate predicts L2 speaking rate [J].
Bradlow, Ann R. ;
Kim, Midam ;
Blasingame, Michael .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2017, 141 (02) :886-899
[40]   How much receptive affix knowledge do L1 speakers and L2 learners have? [J].
Iwaizumi, Emi .
ITL-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2025, 176 (01) :111-146