How Does the Language Control of L1 and L2 Writers Develop Over Time in First-Year Composition?

被引:3
作者
Eckstein, Grant [1 ]
Chang, Ruei-Han [2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Linguist, 4064 JFSB, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
FYC; L1; L2; complexity; accuracy; fluency; plurilingual; SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY-MEASURES; WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; WRITING PEDAGOGY; GENERATION; 1.5; ESL; 2ND-LANGUAGE; STUDENTS; PATTERNS; FEATURES; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1177/07410883221099474
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Most U.S. colleges and universities expect students to improve their writing ability by taking first-year composition (FYC) courses. In such courses, non-native English (L2) writers with diverse language backgrounds study alongside their native English (L1) speaking peers. However, it is not clear how different these populations are in terms of their language development over time, leaving questions unanswered about whether L2 writers develop more or less than L1 writers in an FYC curriculum. To investigate, we compared 75 L1 and L2 students' written accuracy, fluency, and lexical and syntactic complexity over the semester of an FYC course. Data showed that L2 students had significantly higher rates of language error and less fluent and lexically complex writing compared to L1 writers. Moreover, L2 student writing became less grammatically accurate over 14 weeks despite showing greater fluency and syntactic complexity. These results suggest a need for plurilingual pedagogies in FYC that embrace diversity and inclusion while also providing L2 writers with instruction on socially powerful and dominant linguistic forms.
引用
收藏
页码:600 / 629
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing [J].
Casal, J. Elliott ;
Lee, Joseph J. .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2019, 44 :51-62
[22]   Dialogic spaces of knowledge construction in research article Conclusion sections written by English L1, English L2 and Spanish L1 writers [J].
Sheldon, Elena .
IBERICA, 2018, (35) :13-39
[23]   How do Planning Time and Task Conditions Affect Metacognitive Processes of L2 Writers? [J].
Ong, Justina .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2014, 23 :17-30
[24]   Perception of speech rhythm in second language: the case of rhythmically similar L1 and L2 [J].
Ordin, Mikhail ;
Polyanskaya, Leona .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 6
[25]   Formulaic language in L1 and L2 expert academic writing: Convergent and divergent usage [J].
Perez-Llantada, Carmen .
JOURNAL OF ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES, 2014, 14 :84-94
[26]   Individual differences in L1 attainment and language aptitude predict L2 achievement in instructed language learners [J].
Sparks, Richard L. ;
Dale, Philip S. ;
Patton, Jon M. .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2023, :479-508
[27]   Examining metacognitive strategy use in L1 and L2 task-situated writing: effects, transferability, and cross-language facilitation [J].
Xu, Wandong ;
Zhu, Xinhua .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2024, 19 (03) :773-792
[28]   Multilingualism and Affective Attitudes: The Sociocognitive Profiles of First-Year Learners of L2 German [J].
Ruck, Julia .
UNTERRICHTSPRAXIS-TEACHING GERMAN, 2020, 53 (02) :210-228
[29]   Second Language Learners Listening to their Peers: Is There a Shared L1 Effect for L2 Comprehensibility and Accentedness? [J].
Tergujeff, Elina .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2024, 12 (02) :469-491
[30]   Are alphabetic language -derived models of L2 reading relevant to L1 logographic background readers? [J].
Ehrich, John Fitzgerald ;
Zhang, Lawrence Jun ;
Mu, Jon Congjun ;
Ehrich, Lisa Catherine .
LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2013, 22 (01) :39-55