共 21 条
The clinical implications of FDG-PET/CT differ according to histology in advanced gastric cancer
被引:18
作者:
Chon, Hong Jae
[1
,2
]
Kim, Chan
[1
]
Cho, Arthur
[3
]
Kim, Yoo Min
[4
]
Jang, Su Jin
[5
]
Kim, Bo Ok
[6
]
Park, Chan Hyuk
[7
]
Hyung, Woo Jin
[8
]
Ahn, Joong Bae
[9
]
Noh, Sung Hoon
[8
]
Yun, Mijin
[3
]
Rha, Sun Young
[9
]
机构:
[1] CHA Univ, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Med Oncol, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Yonsei Grad Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Nucl Med, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[4] CHA Univ, Dept Surg, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Seongnam, South Korea
[5] CHA Univ, Dept Nucl Med, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Seongnam, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Dept Res Affairs, Biostat Collaborat Unit, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Hanyang Univ, Guri Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Guri, South Korea
[8] Yonsei Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
基金:
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词:
Advanced gastric cancer;
PET;
CT;
Prognostic impact;
Signet ring cell carcinoma;
Diffuse type;
SURGICAL RESECTION;
METABOLISM;
CARCINOMA;
D O I:
10.1007/s10120-018-0847-5
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
BackgroundThe prognostic impact of preoperative F-18-FDG PET/CT in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains a matter of debate. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of SUVmax in preoperative F-18-FDG PET/CT of AGC according to histologic subtype, with a focus on the differences between tubular adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell (SRC) carcinoma.MethodsAs a discovery set, a total of 727 AGC patients from prospective database were analyzed according to histologic subtype with Cox proportional hazard model and p-spline curves. In addition, another 173 patients from an independent institution was assessed as an external validation set.ResultsIn multivariate analysis, high SUVmax in preoperative F-18-FDG PET/CT of AGC was negatively correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with diffuse type (DFS: HR 2.17, P<0.001; OS: HR 2.47, P<0.001) or SRC histology (DFS: HR 2.26, P=0.005; OS: HR 2.61, P=0.003). This negative prognostic impact was not observed in patients with intestinal type or well or moderately differentiated histology. These findings have been consistently confirmed in a validation set. The p-spline curves also showed a gradual increase in log HR as SUVmax rises only for SRC histology and for diffuse-type AGC. Finally, a novel predictive model for recurrence of AGC with diffuse type or SRC histology was generated and validated based on the preoperative SUVmax.ConclusionsPreoperative high SUVmax of AGC is a poor prognostic factor in those with diffuse type or SRC histology. This study is the first to demonstrate the differential prognostic impact of preoperative PET/CT SUVmax in AGC according to histologic subtype and provide a clue to explain previous discrepancies in the prognostic impact of preoperative PET/CT in AGC. Prospective studies are required to validate the role of preoperative SUVmax in AGC.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文