The clinical implications of FDG-PET/CT differ according to histology in advanced gastric cancer

被引:18
作者
Chon, Hong Jae [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Chan [1 ]
Cho, Arthur [3 ]
Kim, Yoo Min [4 ]
Jang, Su Jin [5 ]
Kim, Bo Ok [6 ]
Park, Chan Hyuk [7 ]
Hyung, Woo Jin [8 ]
Ahn, Joong Bae [9 ]
Noh, Sung Hoon [8 ]
Yun, Mijin [3 ]
Rha, Sun Young [9 ]
机构
[1] CHA Univ, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Med Oncol, Seongnam, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Yonsei Grad Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Nucl Med, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[4] CHA Univ, Dept Surg, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Seongnam, South Korea
[5] CHA Univ, Dept Nucl Med, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Seongnam, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Dept Res Affairs, Biostat Collaborat Unit, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Hanyang Univ, Guri Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Guri, South Korea
[8] Yonsei Univ, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[9] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 120752, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Advanced gastric cancer; PET; CT; Prognostic impact; Signet ring cell carcinoma; Diffuse type; SURGICAL RESECTION; METABOLISM; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s10120-018-0847-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe prognostic impact of preoperative F-18-FDG PET/CT in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains a matter of debate. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of SUVmax in preoperative F-18-FDG PET/CT of AGC according to histologic subtype, with a focus on the differences between tubular adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell (SRC) carcinoma.MethodsAs a discovery set, a total of 727 AGC patients from prospective database were analyzed according to histologic subtype with Cox proportional hazard model and p-spline curves. In addition, another 173 patients from an independent institution was assessed as an external validation set.ResultsIn multivariate analysis, high SUVmax in preoperative F-18-FDG PET/CT of AGC was negatively correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with diffuse type (DFS: HR 2.17, P<0.001; OS: HR 2.47, P<0.001) or SRC histology (DFS: HR 2.26, P=0.005; OS: HR 2.61, P=0.003). This negative prognostic impact was not observed in patients with intestinal type or well or moderately differentiated histology. These findings have been consistently confirmed in a validation set. The p-spline curves also showed a gradual increase in log HR as SUVmax rises only for SRC histology and for diffuse-type AGC. Finally, a novel predictive model for recurrence of AGC with diffuse type or SRC histology was generated and validated based on the preoperative SUVmax.ConclusionsPreoperative high SUVmax of AGC is a poor prognostic factor in those with diffuse type or SRC histology. This study is the first to demonstrate the differential prognostic impact of preoperative PET/CT SUVmax in AGC according to histologic subtype and provide a clue to explain previous discrepancies in the prognostic impact of preoperative PET/CT in AGC. Prospective studies are required to validate the role of preoperative SUVmax in AGC.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Variable 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in gastric cancer is associated with different levels of GLUT-1 expression [J].
Alakus, Hakan ;
Batur, Mert ;
Schmidt, Matthias ;
Drebber, Uta ;
Baldus, Stephan E. ;
Vallboehmer, Daniel ;
Prenzel, Klaus L. ;
Metzger, Ralf ;
Bollschweiler, Elfriede ;
Hoelscher, Arnulf H. ;
Moenig, Stefan P. .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 31 (06) :532-538
[2]   Stage-Stratified Prognosis of Signet Ring Cell Histology in Patients Undergoing Curative Resection for Gastric Adenocarcinoma [J].
Bamboat, Zubin M. ;
Tang, Laura H. ;
Vinuela, Eduardo ;
Kuk, Deborah ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Shah, Manish A. ;
Brennan, Murray F. ;
Coit, Daniel G. ;
Strong, Vivian E. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (05) :1678-1685
[3]  
Bar-Shalom R, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P1200
[4]   Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma [J].
Bass, Adam J. ;
Thorsson, Vesteinn ;
Shmulevich, Ilya ;
Reynolds, Sheila M. ;
Miller, Michael ;
Bernard, Brady ;
Hinoue, Toshinori ;
Laird, Peter W. ;
Curtis, Christina ;
Shen, Hui ;
Weisenberger, Daniel J. ;
Schultz, Nikolaus ;
Shen, Ronglai ;
Weinhold, Nils ;
Keiser, David P. ;
Bowlby, Reanne ;
Sipahimalani, Payal ;
Cherniack, Andrew D. ;
Getz, Gad ;
Liu, Yingchun ;
Noble, Michael S. ;
Pedamallu, Chandra ;
Sougnez, Carrie ;
Taylor-Weiner, Amaro ;
Akbani, Rehan ;
Lee, Ju-Seog ;
Liu, Wenbin ;
Mills, Gordon B. ;
Yang, Da ;
Zhang, Wei ;
Pantazi, Angeliki ;
Parfenov, Michael ;
Gulley, Margaret ;
Piazuelo, M. Blanca ;
Schneider, Barbara G. ;
Kim, Jihun ;
Boussioutas, Alex ;
Sheth, Margi ;
Demchok, John A. ;
Rabkin, Charles S. ;
Willis, Joseph E. ;
Ng, Sam ;
Garman, Katherine ;
Beer, David G. ;
Pennathur, Arjun ;
Raphael, Benjamin J. ;
Wu, Hsin-Ta ;
Odze, Robert ;
Kim, Hark K. ;
Bowen, Jay .
NATURE, 2014, 513 (7517) :202-209
[5]   The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of suspected recurrent gastric cancer after initial surgical resection: can the results of FDG PET/CT influence patients' treatment decision making? [J].
Bilici, Ahmet ;
Ustaalioglu, Bala Basak Oven ;
Seker, Mesut ;
Kefeli, Umut ;
Canpolat, Nesrin ;
Tekinsoy, Bulent ;
Ozugur, Sule ;
Gumus, Mahmut .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2011, 38 (01) :64-73
[6]  
Choi BH, 2010, J NUCL MED, V51
[7]   Differential Prognostic Implications of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Stage Adjusted Analysis From a Single High-volume Center in Asia [J].
Chon, Hong Jae ;
Hyung, Woo Jin ;
Kim, Chan ;
Park, Sohee ;
Kim, Jie-Hyun ;
Park, Chan Hyuk ;
Ahn, Joong Bae ;
Kim, Hyunki ;
Chung, Hyun Cheol ;
Rha, Sun Young ;
Noh, Sung Hoon ;
Jeung, Hei-Cheul .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (05) :946-953
[8]   FDG-PET has no definite role in preoperative imaging in gastric cancer [J].
Dassen, A. E. ;
Lips, D. J. ;
Hoekstra, C. J. ;
Pruijt, J. F. M. ;
Bosscha, K. .
EJSO, 2009, 35 (05) :449-455
[9]   Whole-body PET with FDG for the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer [J].
De Potter, T ;
Flamen, P ;
Van Cutsem, E ;
Penninckx, F ;
Filez, L ;
Bormans, G ;
Maes, A ;
Mortelmans, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2002, 29 (04) :525-529
[10]   Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients [J].
Kostakoglu, L ;
Agress, H ;
Goldsmith, SJ .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2003, 23 (02) :315-340